Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.39 seconds)

Kaushal Kishore Awasthi vs The Presiding Officer, Labour Court (I) ... on 5 April, 2016

17. It may be observed that in the present case also, the decision taken is merely to remove the name of petitioner from waiting list and a simple termination has been meted out to him. In view of the materials brought on record, the award of Labour Court would require no interference. Learned counsel for the respondent has also relied upon the judgments of the Apex Court in the case of Divisional Controller, KSRTC (NWKRTC) Vs. A.T. Mane [2005 (3) SCC 254], Devendra Swamy Vs. Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation [2002 (9) SCC 644], North West Karnataka Road Transport Corporation Vs. H.H. Pujar [AIR 2008 SC 3060], Divisional Manager, Rajasthan S.R.T.C. Vs. Kamruddin [AIR 2009 SC 2528], as well as judgments of this Court in the case of Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Jhansi Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court (4), Kanpur [2011 (3) UPLBEC 1979] and U.P.S.R.T.C & Others Vs. K.K. Gupta and others, passed in Writ Petition No.24968 of 1998, dated 4.7.2011 alongwith connected matters, in order to contend that once conductor has misconducted by carrying passengers without proper tickets, then no interference is warranted with the punishment imposed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - A K Mishra - Full Document

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation vs Sri Rajendra Prasad Sharma And Another on 28 February, 2018

In this regard the petitioner relied upon AIR 1996 SC 1249 (Municipal Committee, Bahadurgarh vs. Krishnan Bihari & Ors.) Learned counsel further has also relied upon the judgments reported in 2005 (3) SCC 254 (Divisional Controller, KSRTC (NWKRTC) vs. A.T. Mane), 2002 (9) SCC 644 (Devendra Swamy vs. Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation), AIR 2008 SC 3060 (North West Karnataka Road Transport Corporation vs. H.H.Pujar, AIR 2009 SC 2528 (Divisional Manager, Rajasthan S.R.T.C. vs. Kamruddin and 2011 (3) UPLBEC 1979 (Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Jhansi vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court (4), Kanpur) and has submitted that once a Conductor is found guilty of carrying passengers without proper tickets then no interference is warranted with the punishment.
Allahabad High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 6 - S Varma - Full Document
1