Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 33 (0.67 seconds)
Documents citing Charanjit Singh vs Kehar Singh on 11 May, 2006

Sh. Rohtash Singh vs Sh. Shamsher Singh on 24 December, 2010

Rohtash Singh Vs. Sh. Shamsher Singh & Another (Suit No.1302/08) Page No. 9 of pages 15 In RFA No. 724/2005 titled as Charanjit Singh Vs. Kehar Singh decided on 11.5.2006 (MANU/DE/8646/2006), it has been held by Hon'ble Delhi High Court that: ­ "6. The powers under order 12 rule 6 of the Code has to be exercised judicially on the facts and circumstances of each case. The admission on the basis of which the Court wishes to pass a decree has to be unambiguous, clear and unconditional.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Rajnish Aggarwal vs M/S Indraprastha Travels Pvt. Ltd on 23 February, 2008

CPC. The para no. 3 on merits of the written statement cannot be excluded from the written statement of the defendant wherein the defendant has categorically denied the fact of month to month tenancy as well as its termination by the plaintiff. The defendant has also made pleadings in his written statement which raises serious preliminary pleas and if proved in evidence are likely to non-suit the plaintiff. The reply to para no. 1 and 2 of the plaint in the written statement by saying that it is a matter of record, the defendant can be stated to have made vague averments of the fact which if proved may tantamount to admission on the part of the defendant. If the admissions are of such a nature, in view of the law laid down by our Hon'ble High Court in RFA No. 724/2005 titled as Charanjit Singh Vs. Kehar Singh decided on 11.5.2006 (MANU/DE/8646/2006) the Court may normally decline to pass decree on such admissions. Moreover,
Delhi District Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Annat Jain vs Sh. Sandeep Saraf & Ors on 14 March, 2011

In RFA No. 724/2005 titled as Charanjit Singh Vs. Kehar Singh decided on 11.5.2006 (MANU/DE/8646/2006), it has been held by Hon'ble Delhi High Court that: ­ "6. The powers under order 12 rule 6 of the Code has to be exercised judicially on the facts and circumstances of each case. The admission on the basis of which the Court wishes to pass a decree has to be unambiguous, clear and unconditional.
Delhi District Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Uma Shankar Tiwari vs Mobind on 29 August, 2011

In RFA No. 724/2005 titled as Charanjit Singh Vs. Kehar Singh decided on 11.5.2006 (MANU/DE/8646/2006), it has been held by Hon'ble Delhi High Court that: ­ "6. The powers under order 12 rule 6 of the Code has to be exercised judicially on the facts and circumstances of each case. The admission on the basis of which the Court wishes to pass a decree has to be unambiguous, clear and unconditional.
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Raj Kumar Mehta vs Sh. Kashmiri Babbar on 17 November, 2011

Sh. Raj Kumar Mehta Vs. Sh. Kashmiri Babbar (Suit No.191/11) Page No.7 of pages 10 In RFA No. 724/2005 titled as Charanjit Singh Vs. Kehar Singh decided on 11.5.2006 (MANU/DE/8646/2006), it has been held by Hon'ble Delhi High Court that: ­ "6. The powers under order 12 rule 6 of the Code has to be exercised judicially on the facts and circumstances of each case. The admission on the basis of which the Court wishes to pass a decree has to be unambiguous, clear and unconditional.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next