Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.30 seconds)

Madurai Coats Private Limited vs The Appellate Authority on 12 May, 2009

46. The Division Bench of this Court in Noyyal River Ayacutdars Protection Association and Another v. The Government of Tamil Nadu & Others, 2007 (1) LW 275, while emphasizing the importance of safeguarding the forest wild life in the country, as enshrined under Article 48-A of the Constitution of India, and connecting it with the fundamental duty on every citizen to protect and improve the natural environment enunciated under Article 51-A(g) of the Constitution of India, held that the thread of right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India passes into the above-said celebrated principle of the Constitution of India and further held that the Pollution Control Board should not only ensure proper environment, but it is also its imperative duty to improve the environment.
Madras High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Eastern Common Effluent Treatment ... vs The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, ... on 22 March, 2007

1. The petitioners in these writ petitions were admittedly party to the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court made in W.P. Nos. 29791 of 2003 and 39368 of 2003, which were disposed on 22.12.2006 in Noyyal River Ayacutdars Protection Association v. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary and Ors. In those writ petitions, apart from several other directions, this Court imposed fine on the Common Effluent Treatment Plants [for short, 'CETPs'] on the basis of 'polluter pays principle'. Paragraph 30(a)(i) of our judgment dated 22.12.2006 reads as follows:
Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - K Chandru - Full Document

Eastern Common Effluent Treatment ... vs The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board on 8 January, 2007

(Order of the Court was made by K. CHANDRU, J.) The petitioners in these writ petitions were admittedly party to the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court made in W.P.Nos.29791 of 2003 and 39368 of 2003, which were disposed on 22.12.2006 in Noyyal River Ayacutdars Protection Association vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary and others. In those writ petitions, apart from several other directions, this Court imposed fine on the Common Effluent Treatment Plants [for short, 'CETPs'] on the basis of 'polluter pays principle'. Paragraph 30(a)(i) of our judgment dated 22.12.2006 reads as follows:
Madras High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1