Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (1.37 seconds)
Documents citing Maharashtra State Electricity ... vs M/S. Rsr Mohota Spinning And Weaving ... on 4 October, 2023

Maharashtra State Electricity ... vs Reliable Autotech. Pvt. Ltd on 16 July, 2024

(a) The decision of Division Bench of this Court in MSEDCL vs RSR Mohota Spinning and Weaving Mills Limited and Another(supra) has held that the period of limitation prescribed by Regulation 6.6 of Regulations of 2006 are directory. The decision though stayed by the Apex Court, will not destroy the binding effect of the judgment as a precedent as the Apex Court has not laid down any proposition of law inconsistent with the one declared by the High Court which is impugned.
Bombay High Court Cites 52 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document

Jindal Polyfilms Limted vs Maharashtra State Electricity ... on 16 July, 2024

(a) The decision of Division Bench of this Court in MSEDCL vs RSR Mohota Spinning and Weaving Mills Limited and Another(supra) has held that the period of limitation prescribed by Regulation 6.6 of Regulations of 2006 are directory. The decision though stayed by the Apex Court, will not destroy the binding effect of the judgment as a precedent as the Apex Court has not laid down any proposition of law inconsistent with the one declared by the High Court which is impugned.
Bombay High Court Cites 52 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document

Jindal Poly Films Limited vs Maharashtra State Electricity ... on 16 July, 2024

(a) The decision of Division Bench of this Court in MSEDCL vs RSR Mohota Spinning and Weaving Mills Limited and Another(supra) has held that the period of limitation prescribed by Regulation 6.6 of Regulations of 2006 are directory. The decision though stayed by the Apex Court, will not destroy the binding effect of the judgment as a precedent as the Apex Court has not laid down any proposition of law inconsistent with the one declared by the High Court which is impugned.
Bombay High Court Cites 52 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document

Maharashtra State Electricity ... vs M/S. Mitc Rolling Mill Pvt. Ltd on 16 July, 2024

(a) The decision of Division Bench of this Court in MSEDCL vs RSR Mohota Spinning and Weaving Mills Limited and Another(supra) has held that the period of limitation prescribed by Regulation 6.6 of Regulations of 2006 are directory. The decision though stayed by the Apex Court, will not destroy the binding effect of the judgment as a precedent as the Apex Court has not laid down any proposition of law inconsistent with the one declared by the High Court which is impugned.
Bombay High Court Cites 52 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document

Maharashtra State Electricity ... vs M/S. Jindal Polyfilms Ltd on 16 July, 2024

(a) The decision of Division Bench of this Court in MSEDCL vs RSR Mohota Spinning and Weaving Mills Limited and Another(supra) has held that the period of limitation prescribed by Regulation 6.6 of Regulations of 2006 are directory. The decision though stayed by the Apex Court, will not destroy the binding effect of the judgment as a precedent as the Apex Court has not laid down any proposition of law inconsistent with the one declared by the High Court which is impugned.
Bombay High Court Cites 52 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document

Maharashtra State Electricity ... vs M/S. Mitc Rolling Mill Pvt. Ltd on 16 July, 2024

(a) The decision of Division Bench of this Court in MSEDCL vs RSR Mohota Spinning and Weaving Mills Limited and Another(supra) has held that the period of limitation prescribed by Regulation 6.6 of Regulations of 2006 are directory. The decision though stayed by the Apex Court, will not destroy the binding effect of the judgment as a precedent as the Apex Court has not laid down any proposition of law inconsistent with the one declared by the High Court which is impugned.
Bombay High Court Cites 52 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document

Maharashtra State Electricity ... vs Slidewell Meilleur Tech Pvt. Ltd on 16 July, 2024

(a) The decision of Division Bench of this Court in MSEDCL vs RSR Mohota Spinning and Weaving Mills Limited and Another(supra) has held that the period of limitation prescribed by Regulation 6.6 of Regulations of 2006 are directory. The decision though stayed by the Apex Court, will not destroy the binding effect of the judgment as a precedent as the Apex Court has not laid down any proposition of law inconsistent with the one declared by the High Court which is impugned.
Bombay High Court Cites 52 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document

Maharashtra State Electricity ... vs Okay Fern Precision Casting Pvt. Ltd on 16 July, 2024

(a) The decision of Division Bench of this Court in MSEDCL vs RSR Mohota Spinning and Weaving Mills Limited and Another(supra) has held that the period of limitation prescribed by Regulation 6.6 of Regulations of 2006 are directory. The decision though stayed by the Apex Court, will not destroy the binding effect of the judgment as a precedent as the Apex Court has not laid down any proposition of law inconsistent with the one declared by the High Court which is impugned.
Bombay High Court Cites 52 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document

Maharashtra State Elecricity ... vs Shri Aniruddha Dharmadhikari Shree ... on 16 July, 2024

(a) The decision of Division Bench of this Court in MSEDCL vs RSR Mohota Spinning and Weaving Mills Limited and Another(supra) has held that the period of limitation prescribed by Regulation 6.6 of Regulations of 2006 are directory. The decision though stayed by the Apex Court, will not destroy the binding effect of the judgment as a precedent as the Apex Court has not laid down any proposition of law inconsistent with the one declared by the High Court which is impugned.
Bombay High Court Cites 52 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document

Maharashtra State Electricity ... vs Nashik Steel Pvt. Ltd on 16 July, 2024

(a) The decision of Division Bench of this Court in MSEDCL vs RSR Mohota Spinning and Weaving Mills Limited and Another(supra) has held that the period of limitation prescribed by Regulation 6.6 of Regulations of 2006 are directory. The decision though stayed by the Apex Court, will not destroy the binding effect of the judgment as a precedent as the Apex Court has not laid down any proposition of law inconsistent with the one declared by the High Court which is impugned.
Bombay High Court Cites 52 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document
1   2 Next