Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 403 (0.93 seconds)
Documents citing The Kerala State Electricity Board, ... vs T.P. Kunhaliumma on 29 October, 1976

G. Lakshmi Ammal vs Elumalai Chettiar And Ors. on 30 April, 1980

8. Two other aspects were relied upon by Mr. Mathrubhutham to contend that the statutory authorities do not function like a civil court by stating that Court-fees Act is not attracted and Civil Procedure Code is not invoked into in respect of the proceedings conducted under the Act, and therefore the decisions evolved in Surindramohan v. Dharamchand, AIR 1971 J and K 76 (FB) or of what had been spelt out in Kerala S. E. Board v. Kunhaliumma, are not applicable to this case. Undoubtedly, these are relevant factors to ascertain the nature of powers exercised and necessarily lead to the conclusion that they are not courts.
Madras High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 6 - Full Document

Union Of India (Uoi), Rep. By Its ... vs Mysore Paper Mills Ltd. And Ors. on 29 August, 2003

The decision of the Full Bench in M/s. EXCELLENT EDUCATION SOCIETY and followed by the Division Bench in SHADHIDAR's case referred to above cannot be said to be laying down correct law as in the said decision the essential distinction between ordinary Court of civil judicature and tribunal has not been borne in mind and support sought from decisions of Supreme Court in KERALA ELECTRICITY BOARD v. T.P. KUNHALIUMMA and in CHHAGAN LAL v. INDORE MUNICIPALITY , was not justified as in those cases the appellate jurisdiction had been conferred upon Courts of civil judicature without further limitation and hence it was held that all the incidents of decision of Civil Court would follow.
Karnataka High Court Cites 101 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

Nalgonda Co-Op. Marketing Society Ltd. vs Labour Court And Ors. on 18 March, 1993

41. Even the provisions of Sub-section (2) of Section 29 of the Limitation Act, 1963 are attracted only when an appeal or an application under any special or local law is provided to a Court and they will not apply where such an appeal or application under special or local law is provided to a Tribunal or authority, which is not a court. The Supreme Court has made it clear in The Kerala State Electricity Board, Trivandrum v. T.P. Kunhaliumma (supra) that any other application contemplated under Article 137 covers only applications that are filed under any special or local law in a court and not before a Tribunal or authority.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 90 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

The Executive Engineer (Ele) vs Gurusiddappa S/O K.S.Sidlingappa on 10 March, 2025

9. The facts are sufficiently stated and they do not require reiteration. Sri.Gurusiddappa filed a claim petition under section 16 (3) of the Indian Telegraph Act 1885 before the District Court and sought enhancement of compensation. It is pertinent to note that the Hon'ble Apex Court in THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, TRIVANDRUM VS. T.P.KUNHALIUMMA reported in (1976) 4 SCC 634 has held that while dealing with the applications under Section 16 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 for enhancement of compensation, the District Judge acts as Civil Court and hence Article 137 applies.
Karnataka High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - J Mulimani - Full Document

The Executive Engineer (Ele) vs Kotrappa Kallalli Aliyas K Halli ... on 10 March, 2025

9. The facts are sufficiently stated and they do not require reiteration. Sri.Kotrappa Kallalli filed a claim petition under section 16 (3) of the Indian Telegraph Act 1885 before the District Court and sought enhancement of compensation. It is pertinent to note that the Hon'ble Apex Court in THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, TRIVANDRUM VS. T.P.KUNHALIUMMA reported in (1976) 4 SCC 634 has held that while dealing with the applications under Section 16 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 for enhancement of compensation, the District Judge acts as Civil Court and hence Article 137 applies.
Karnataka High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - J Mulimani - Full Document

The Executive Engineer (Ele) vs B H Basavarajappa S/O Siddappa on 10 March, 2025

9. The facts are sufficiently stated and they do not require reiteration. B.H.Basavarajappa filed a claim petition under section 16 (3) of the Indian Telegraph Act 1885 before the District Court and sought enhancement of compensation. It is pertinent to note that the Hon'ble Apex Court in THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, TRIVANDRUM VS. T.P.KUNHALIUMMA reported in (1976) 4 SCC 634 has held that while dealing with the applications under Section 16 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 for enhancement of compensation, the District Judge acts as Civil Court and hence Article 137 applies.
Karnataka High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - J Mulimani - Full Document

The Executive Engineer (Ele) vs Holibasappa S/O Ramappa on 10 March, 2025

9. The facts are sufficiently stated and they do not require reiteration. Sri.Holibasappa filed a claim petition under section 16 (3) of the Indian Telegraph Act 1885 before the District Court and sought enhancement of compensation. It is pertinent to note that the Hon'ble Apex Court in THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, TRIVANDRUM VS. T.P.KUNHALIUMMA reported in (1976) 4 SCC 634 has held that while dealing with the applications under Section 16 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 for enhancement of compensation, the District Judge acts as Civil Court and hence Article 137 applies.
Karnataka High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - J Mulimani - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next