Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.38 seconds)
Documents citing Pandurang Sakharam Pawar vs Under Secretary To Government Of ... on 16 February, 1981

Devidas Ramesh Sinde vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr Its ... on 3 December, 2021

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that apart from their own documents, the petitioners had produced the school record of the blood relatives wherein caste is recorded as 'Thakur'. The petitioners had also produced land records in the form as Khasra Patrak of the year 1954, National Register of Citizens of the year 1951, Lawni Patrak of 1349 Fasli i.e. of the year 1939 to substantiate their claim. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, as per the practice prevailing at the relevant time, the caste 'Thakur' was mentioned in place of their surname. According to the learned counsel, all these land revenue documents did not have a caste column and as such, the documents could not be considered as misdirected itself in law. It is no doubt, true that there is no Caste-Tribe column in these documents. The very fact, however, that the persons are identified by the word 'Thakur' which is Notified Scheduled Tribe would by itself be a strong factor in favour of the petitioners. All these aspects are highlighted in the case of Shri Prasad s/o Sakharam Pawar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others in Writ Petition No.4514 of ::: Uploaded on - 04/12/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 05/12/2021 03:59:48 ::: WP 2465,2467.21 5 2002 decided on 18 November 2003.
Bombay High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gaurav Gajanan Shinde Under Guardian ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr Its ... on 3 December, 2021

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that apart from their own documents, the petitioners had produced the school record of the blood relatives wherein caste is recorded as 'Thakur'. The petitioners had also produced land records in the form as Khasra Patrak of the year 1954, National Register of Citizens of the year 1951, Lawni Patrak of 1349 Fasli i.e. of the year 1939 to substantiate their claim. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, as per the practice prevailing at the relevant time, the caste 'Thakur' was mentioned in place of their surname. According to the learned counsel, all these land revenue documents did not have a caste column and as such, the documents could not be considered as misdirected itself in law. It is no doubt, true that there is no Caste-Tribe column in these documents. The very fact, however, that the persons are identified by the word 'Thakur' which is Notified Scheduled Tribe would by itself be a strong factor in favour of the petitioners. All these aspects are highlighted in the case of Shri Prasad s/o Sakharam Pawar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others in Writ Petition No.4514 of ::: Uploaded on - 04/12/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 05/12/2021 03:59:44 ::: WP 2465,2467.21 5 2002 decided on 18 November 2003.
Bombay High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Avinash Nilkanth Jadhav vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 3 December, 2021

15. The petitioner had also produced land revenue record i.e. Khasra Patrak and Khasra Pahani Patrak of the year 1953-54 wherein name of brother of grandfather of petitioner is mentioned as Baba Kondiba Thakur. The petitioner has also submitted documents Khasra Pahani Patrak of 1343 Fasli i.e. for the year 1933 in the name of his great grandfather's brother namely Kondiba Irba Thakur. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner as per the practice prevailing at the relevant time the caste 'Thakur' was mentioned in place of their surname 'Jadhav'. According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner all these documents did not have a Caste Column and as such the ::: Uploaded on - 04/12/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 05/12/2021 03:34:33 ::: WP 10056-19 8 documents could not be considered has misdirected itself in law. It is no doubt true that there is no caste/tribe column in these documents. The very fact, however, that the persons are identified by the word 'Thakur' which is a notified scheduled tribe would by itself be a strong factor in favour of the petitioner. All these aspects are highlighted in the case of Shri Prasad s/o Sakharam Pawar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others in Writ Petition No.4514 of 2002 decided on 18 November 2003.
Bombay High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - R N Laddha - Full Document
1