Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.42 seconds)
Documents citing Shri Parshadi And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 3 November, 2009

Balwan vs State Of Haryana on 6 April, 2010

In Parshadi v. State of Haryana, 2004(2) R.C.R. (Criminal) 360, the sentence of a similarly situated accused, who stood convicted under Section 7 read with Section 16(1)(a)(i) of the Act was reduced to that already undergone by him as he had been facing the trial Criminal Revision No. 162 of 1994 -6- for a period of fourteen years. However, his fine was enhanced. While doing so, the Court relied upon a number of judgments, viz.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - T P Mann - Full Document

Sardara Ram vs Govt. Food Inspector Through State Of ... on 9 May, 2016

In Parshadi Vs. State of Haryana, 2004(2) RCR (Criminal) 360, the sentence of a similarly situated accused, who stood convicted under Section 7 read with Section 16(1)(a)(i) of the Act was reduced to that already undergone by him as he had been facing the trial for a period of fourteen years. However, his fine was enhanced. While doing so, the Court had relied upon a number of judgments, viz.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - T P Mann - Full Document

Jarnail Singh vs State Of Haryana on 9 May, 2016

In Parshadi Vs. State of Haryana, 2004(2) RCR (Criminal) 360, the sentence of a similarly situated accused, who stood convicted under Section 7 read with Section 16(1)(a)(i) of the Act was reduced to that already undergone by him as he had been facing the trial for a period of fourteen years. However, his fine was enhanced. While doing so, the Court had relied upon a number of judgments, viz.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - T P Mann - Full Document

Kartar Singh vs State Of Haryana on 10 May, 2016

In Parshadi Vs. State of Haryana, 2004(2) RCR (Criminal) 360, the sentence of a similarly situated accused, who stood convicted under Section 7 read with Section 16(1)(a)(i) of the Act was reduced to that already undergone by him as he had been facing the trial for a period of fourteen years. However, his fine was enhanced. While doing so, the Court relied upon a number of judgments, viz.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - T P Mann - Full Document
1