Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.57 seconds)
Documents citing Mr Ashwath Narayanareddy vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 December, 2022

Anuradha Suvarna vs Smt. Vijayalakshmi Patil on 1 February, 2023

e). That arising out of the judgment passed in writ appeal No.2294/1999 and Review Petition Nos. 2086-2087/200 before Hon'ble Apex Court which is decided on 02-02-2007, dismissing the Civil Appeals, reported on 2007 AIR SCW 1164. Hon'ble Apex Court placing reliance on decision of Division Bench of this Hon'ble 43 OS.NO.7132/2017 Court in the case of Narayanareddy Vs State of Karnataka reported in ILR 1991 KAR 2248, decision in W.A.No.2336-
Bangalore District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mr.Srinivasan Balasubramanian vs Smt. Vijayalakshmi Patil on 1 February, 2023

e). That arising out of the judgment passed in writ appeal No.2294/1999 and Review Petition Nos. 2086-2087/200 before Hon'ble Apex Court which is decided on 02-02-2007, dismissing 38 OS.NO.3825/2018 the Civil Appeals, reported on 2007 AIR SCW 1164. Hon'ble Apex Court placing reliance on decision of Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in the case of Narayanareddy Vs State of Karnataka reported in ILR 1991 KAR 2248, decision in W.A.No.2336-
Bangalore District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri. Chunnilal Suthar (Huf) vs Smt. Vijayalakshmi Patil on 1 February, 2023

e) That arising out of the judgment passed in writ Appeal No. 2294/1999 and Review Petition Nos.2086-2087/2004 before Hon'ble Apex Court which is decided on 02-02-2007, dismissing the Civil Appeals, reported on 2007 AIR SCW 1164. Hon'ble Apex Court placing reliance on decision of Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in the case of Narayanareddy Vs State of Karnataka reported in ILR 1991 KAR 2248, decision in W.A.No.2336- 2434/1997, decision in the case of HMT HBSC vs. Syed Khader and Ors. Reported in (1995) 2 SCC 677 and decision in HMT HBSC Vs. M. Venkateswamappa&ors. Reported in (1995)3 SCC 128 categorically laid down and recorded finding at para 6 of the judgment holding that, when the acquisition has been found totally malafied and not for bonafied purpose, the ground of delay and acquiescence in the case has no substance. It is further held that, the issue of notification was malafied and it was not for public purpose.
Bangalore District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri. A.H. Manjunath vs Smt. Vijayalakshmi Patil on 1 February, 2023

f) That arising out of the Judgment passed in Writ Appeal No. 2294/1999 and Review petition No.156/2000 the Society preferred Civil Appeal Nos. 2086-2087/2004 before Hon'ble Apex Court which is decided on 02.02.2007, dismissing the Civil Appeals, reported in 2007 AIR SCW 1164. Hon'ble Apex Court placing reliance on decision of Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in the case of Narayanareddy Vs State of Karnataka reported in ILR 1991 KAR 2248, decision in WA No.2336-2343/1997, decision in the case of HMT HBCS Vs. Syed Khader and Ors. reported in (1995)2 SCC 677 and decision in HMT HBCS Vs. M.Venkataswamappa & Ors, reported in (1995)3 SCC 128 categorically laid down and recorded finding at para-6 of the Judgment holding that, when the acquisition has been found totally malafide and not for bonafide purpose, the ground of delay and acquiescence in the case has no substance. It is further held that, the issue of notification was malafide and it was not for public purpose.
Bangalore District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1