Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 534 (1.17 seconds)
Documents citing A.P. Public Service Commission, ... vs B. Sarat Chandra & Ors on 10 April, 1990

Sanjeev Kumar Pandey vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors. on 10 May, 2012

In the case of A.P. Public Service Commission v. B. Sarat Chandra2 the relevant service rule stipulated that the candidate should not have completed the age of 26 years on the 1st day of July of the year in which the selection is made. Such a cut-off date was challenged. This Court considered the various steps required in the process of selection and said, "when such are the different steps in the process of selection the minimum or maximum age of suitability of a candidate for appointment cannot be allowed to depend upon any fluctuating or uncertain date. If the final stage of selection is delayed and more often it happens for various reasons, the candidates who are eligible on the date of application may find themselves eliminated at the final stage for no fault of theirs. The date to attain the minimum or maximum age must, therefore, be specific and determinate as on a particular date for candidates to apply and for the recruiting agency to scrutinise the applications".
Jharkhand High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - D N Patel - Full Document

The State Of Jharkhand Through The ... vs Kokila Devi And Ors on 3 July, 2017

"5.  This contention, in our view, is not sustainable. In the first place   the fixing of a cut­off date for determining the maximum or minimum   age prescribed for a post is not, per se, arbitrary. Basically, the fixing   of   a   cut­off   date   for   determining   the   maximum   or   minimum   age   required for a post,  is in the discretion of the rule­making authority   or the employer as the case may be. One must accept that such a cut­ off date cannot be fixed with any mathematical precision and in such   a manner as would avoid hardship in all conceivable cases. As soon as   a cut­off date is fixed there will be some persons who fall on the right   side of the cut­off date and some persons who will fall on the wrong   side of the cut­off date. That cannot make the cut­off date, per se,   arbitrary unless the cut­off date is so wide off the mark as to make it   wholly unreasonable. This view was expressed by this Court in Union   of India v. Parameswaran Match Works and has been reiterated in   subsequent cases. In the case of A.P. Public Service Commission v. B.   Sarat Chandra the relevant service rule stipulated that the candidate   should not have completed the age of 26 years on the 1st day of July   of the year in which the selection is made. Such a cut­off date was   challenged. This Court considered the various steps required in the   process of selection and said,   "when such are the different steps in the process of selection   the minimum or maximum age of suitability of a candidate for   appointment cannot be allowed to depend upon any fluctuating   or uncertain date. If the final stage of selection is delayed and   more often it happens for various reasons, the candidates who   are   eligible   on   the   date   of   application   may   find   themselves   eliminated at the final stage for no fault of theirs. The date to   attain   the   minimum   or   maximum   age   must,   therefore,   be   specific and determinate as on a particular date for candidates   to   apply   and   for   the   recruiting   agency   to   scrutinise   the   applications".
Jharkhand High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 1 - D N Patel - Full Document

R.Muthuselvi vs The Secretary on 7 October, 2016

Placing reliance on the decisions of this Court in Ashok Kumar Sharma v. Chander Shekhar, A.P. Public Service Commission v. B. Sarat Chandra, District Collector and Chairman, Vizianagaram Social Welfare Residential School Society v. M. Tripura Sundari Devi, Rekha Chaturvedi v. University of Rajasthan, M.V. Nair (Dr) v. Union of India and U.P. Public Service Commission U.P., Allahabad v. Alpana the High Court has held (i) that the cut-off date by reference to which the eligibility requirement must be satisfied by the candidate seeking a public employment is the date appointed by the relevant service rules and if there be no cut-off date appointed by the rules then such date as may be appointed for the purpose in the advertisement calling for applications; (ii) that if there be no such date appointed then the eligibility criteria shall be applied by reference to the last date appointed by which the applications have to be received by the competent authority. The view taken by the High Court is supported by several decisions of this Court and is therefore well settled and hence cannot be found fault with. However, there are certain special features of this case which need to be taken care of and justice be done by invoking the jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution vested in this Court so as to advance the cause of justice."
Madras High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - T Raja - Full Document

Prem Chand Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand Through The ... on 21 June, 2018

In the case of A.P. Public Service Commission v. B. Sarat Chandra the relevant service rule stipulated that the 17 candidate should not have completed the age of 26 years on the 1st day of July of the year in which the selection is made. Such a cut-off date was challenged. This Court considered the various steps required in the process of selection and said, "when such are the different steps in the process of selection the minimum or maximum age of suitability of a candidate for appointment cannot be allowed to depend upon any fluctuating or uncertain date. If the final stage of selection is delayed and more often it happens for various reasons, the candidates who are eligible on the date of application may find themselves eliminated at the final stage for no fault of theirs. The date to attain the minimum or maximum age must, therefore, be specific and determinate as on a particular date for candidates to apply and for the recruiting agency to scrutinise the applications".
Jharkhand High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 1 - A K Gupta - Full Document

Animesh Kumar Patra vs The State Of Jharkhand Through The ... on 15 May, 2018

In the case of A.P. Public Service Commission v. B. Sarat Chandra the relevant service rule stipulated that the candidate should not have completed the age of 26 years on the 1st day of July of the year in which the selection is made. Such a cut-off date was challenged. This Court considered the various steps required in the process of selection and said, "when such are the different steps in the process of selection the minimum or maximum age of suitability of a candidate for appointment cannot be allowed to depend upon any fluctuating or uncertain date. If the final stage of selection is delayed and more often it happens for various reasons, the candidates who are eligible on the date of application may find themselves eliminated at the final stage for no fault of theirs. The date to attain the minimum or maximum age must, therefore, be specific and determinate as on a particular date for candidates to apply and for the recruiting agency to scrutinise the applications".
Jharkhand High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - A K Gupta - Full Document

Sangita Mayda vs Veterinary Science And Animal ... on 12 January, 2017

“Placing reliance on the decisions of this Court in Ashok Kumar Sharma Vs. Chander Shekhar, A.P. Public Service Commission Vs. B. Sarat Chandra, District Collector and Chairman, Vizianagaram Social Welfare Residential School Society Vs. M. Tripura Sundari Devi, Rekha Chaturvedi Vs. University of Rajasthan, M.V. Nair (Dr.) Vs. Union of India and U.P. Public Service Commission U.P., Allahabad Vs. Alpana the High Court has held (i) that the cut-off date by reference to which the eligibility requirement must be satisfied by the candidate seeking a public employment is the date appointed by the relevant service rules and if there be no cut-off date appointed by the rules then such date as may be appointed for the purpose in the advertisement calling for applications; (ii) that if there be no such date appointed then the eligibility criteria shall be applied by reference to the last date appointed by which the applications have to be received by the competent authority. The view taken by the High Court is supported by several decisions of this Court and is therefore well settled and hence cannot be found fault with.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next