Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.43 seconds)

A.H. Magermans vs S.K. Ghose And Ors. on 19 May, 1965

In support of this contention Mr. Roy Chowdhurj referred to a decision of this Court in S. P. Ghose v. Deputy Controller, Reserve Bank of India, , in which it was held that mere long residence or acquisi tion of property is not enough to establish an intention of abandoning a domicile of origin and acquiring a domicile of choice. There was no intention on the part of the appellant to abandon his Belgian domicile and to acquire an Indian domicile, This contention of Mr. Roy Chow dhury is sound.
Calcutta High Court Cites 61 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

United Bank Of India vs Ram Raj Goala on 13 September, 1979

Mr. Moitra also referred to a Bench decisions of the Andhra Pradesh High Court made in the case of P.S. Gceta v. The Central Bank of India (1978) Labour and Industrial cases 1271, It was held in the said case that whatever may have been the position with regard to the validity of the rules before the Banks were acquired under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Under takings) Act, 1970, after such acquisition the Banks had become the State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution.
Calcutta High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - G N Ray - Full Document
1