Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.39 seconds)
Documents citing Bitu Yadav @ Vikas Yadav vs State (Nct Of Delhi ) & Anr. on 7 September, 2020

Rupesh Kumar vs State & Anr. on 21 February, 2022

14. It is observed that in exercise of power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, Co- ordinate Benches of this Court have also earlier quashed FIRs registered under Section 376 IPC, pursuant to compromise having been arrived at between the parties [Refer: Bitu Yadav v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Ors. reported as MANU/DE/1683/2020; Ashish v. State and Another reported as 2021 SCC OnLine Del 3160 and Vikash Kumar v. State and Another reported as 2021 SCC OnLine Del 2749].
Delhi High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - M K Ohri - Full Document

Saurabh Malhotra S/O Suraj Malhotra vs State Of Rajasthan on 6 January, 2023

(16) The counsel appearing for the petitioner has placed reliance on the order passed by Delhi High Court in Bitu Yadav @ Vikas Yadav v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr., [CRL.M.C.1761/2020 dated 07.09.2020], wherein the court has quashed the FIR where the prosecutrix and the accused were married. Paras 17, 18 and 19 of the said order, read as under :-
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - A K Dhand - Full Document

Vinod Singh Saini And Others vs U. T. Of J&K And Another on 20 February, 2023

11. Mr. Raja Ram Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has placed reliance on an order dated 07.09.2020 passed by this Court in Bitu Yadav @ Vikas Yadav v. State(NCT of Delhi), [CRL.M.C.1761/2020], wherein this Court has quashed the FIR where the prosecutrix and the accused were married. Paras 17, 18 and 19 of the said order, read as under:
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - S Dhar - Full Document

Sh. Jaidev Singh vs The State (Nct Of Delhi) & Anr on 4 May, 2022

10. Mr. Raja Ram Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has placed reliance on an order dated 07.09.2020 passed by this Court in Bitu Yadav @ Vikas Yadav v. State(NCT of Delhi) & Anr., [CRL.M.C.1761/2020], wherein this Court has quashed the FIR where the prosecutrix and the accused were married. Paras 17, 18 and 19 of the said order, read as under:
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - J Singh - Full Document

Ashish Kumar vs State Through Sho Burari North & Anr on 13 May, 2022

4. Ms. Nandita Rao, learned Additional standing Counsel for the State placing reliance on judgments in Ananda D.V Vs. State & Anr. in Criminal Appeal Nos.394-395/2021 [order dated 12th April, 2021] and of the High Court in Brajesh Kumar Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr in CRL.M.C.13/2020 [order dated 6th April, 2022], Vikash Kumar Vs. The State and Anr in CRL.M.C.1015/2021 [order dated 25th March, 2021], Kundan & Anr Vs State & Ors in CRL.M.C.27/2022 [order dated 21st February, 2022], Bitu Yadav @ Vikas Yadav Vs State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr in CRL.M.C.1761/2020 [order dated 7th September, 2020], Gaurav Vs. State (Govt NCT of Delhi) and Anr. in W.P.(CRL)1378/2021 [order dated 28th July, 2021] & Swatantra Kumar Jaysawal Vs. State & Anr. 2022 SCC OnLine Del 30, submits that the court may exercise its discretion. She further submits that the respondent No.2 had turned major in 2021 and though the FIR was registered only on 9th March, 2022, POCSO has been incorporated because the events had occurred in 2019.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - A Menon - Full Document

Ranjeet Singh vs State Nct Of Delhi And Anr on 15 May, 2024

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2024 at 22:20:05 attention of the court to the decision of this Court in Bitu Yadav @ Vikas Yadav vs. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.: AIR OnLine 2020 Del 1247 wherein under similar circumstances it was observed as under:-
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1