Dinesh Singh vs Dlf Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. on 28 June, 2018
Under above circumstances, to dictate order, facts are being taken from consumer complaint bearing no. 161 of 2018, titled as Maj. Gen. (Retd.) M.P. Singh and another Vs. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Limited and ors. Against buyer agreement dated 19.11.2010 Annexure C-1, the complainants purchased an independent floor in a project launched by opposite party no.1. Opposite parties no.2 and 3 are the Directors of opposite party no.1. Opposite parties no.4 to 10 are the Govt. Officials/Officers. In this complaint, no relief has been claimed against them. It appears that they have been impleaded in this complaint, for the purpose of collecting evidence. It is on record that possession of the unit was offered to the complainants on 29.10.2016. Consumer complaint bearing no.837 of 2016 was filed by the complainants before this Commission on 22.11.2016, stating therein that the offer so made by opposite parties no.1 to 3 was only a paper possession; the flat was not habitable, due to large number of defects in construction and non-availability of basic amenities at the project site. In the said complaint, directions were sought to be given to opposite party no.1 to deliver possession of a habitable unit and to complete all other basic amenities and also to compensate the complainants for delay in delivery thereof, alongwith other reliefs.