Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.64 seconds)
Documents citing Sri Shamrao Rukamanna Talwar vs Smt. Suvarna By Her Pa Holder Sri ... on 23 October, 2007

Smt.Vidyavathi vs Sri.Mohammed Farooq Sait on 30 June, 2020

The tenant in such a suit is estopped from questioning the title of the landlord under section 116 of the Evidence Act. The tenant cannot deny that the landlord had title to the premises at the commencement of the tenancy. Under the general law in a suit between landlord and tenant the question of title to the leased property is irrelevant. (2) ILR 2008 Kar 1493 in Sri.Shamrao Rukmnna Talwar Vs. Smt.Suvarna to contend that the landlord who seeks eviction under section 27(2) are need not be an absolute owner of the premises - the word landlord has been defined under the Act, meaning - a person who for the time being is receiving or is entitled to receive the rent of any premises.
Bangalore District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt.Vidyavathi vs Sri.Syed Nizamuddin on 30 June, 2020

The tenant in such a suit is estopped from questioning the title of the landlord under section 116 of the Evidence 32 Act. The tenant cannot deny that the landlord had title to the premises at the commencement of the tenancy. Under the general law in a suit between landlord and tenant the question of title to the leased property is irrelevant (2) ILR 2008 Kar 1493 in Sri.Shamrao Rukmnna Talwar Vs. Smt.Suvarna to contend that the landlord who seeks eviction under section 27(2) are need not be an absolute owner of the premises - the word landlord has been defined under the Act, meaning - a person who for the time being is receiving or is entitled to receive the rent of any premises.
Bangalore District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt.Vidyavathi vs Sri.Abid on 30 June, 2020

The tenant in such a suit is estopped from questioning the title of the landlord under section 116 of the Evidence Act. The tenant cannot deny that the landlord had title to the premises at the commencement of the tenancy. Under the general law in a suit between landlord and 32 tenant the question of title to the leased property is irrelevant (2) ILR 2008 Kar 1493 in Sri.Shamrao Rukmnna Talwar Vs. Smt.Suvarna to contend that the landlord who seeks eviction under section 27(2) are need not be an absolute owner of the premises - the word landlord has been defined under the Act, meaning - a person who for the time being is receiving or is entitled to receive the rent of any premises.
Bangalore District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt.Vidyavathi vs Sri.Nawaz Pasha on 30 June, 2020

The tenant in such a suit is estopped from questioning the title of the landlord under section 116 of the Evidence Act. The tenant cannot deny that the landlord had title to the premises at the commencement of the tenancy. Under the general law in a suit between landlord and tenant the question of title to the leased property is irrelevant. 30 (2) ILR 2008 Kar 1493 in Sri.Shamrao Rukmnna Talwar Vs. Smt.Suvarna to contend that the landlord who seeks eviction under section 27(2) are need not be an absolute owner of the premises - the word landlord has been defined under the Act, meaning - a person who for the time being is receiving or is entitled to receive the rent of any premises.
Bangalore District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt.Vidyavathi vs Sri.Syed Nayeem on 30 June, 2020

The tenant in such a suit is estopped from questioning the title of the landlord under section 116 of the Evidence Act. 31 The tenant cannot deny that the landlord had title to the premises at the commencement of the tenancy. Under the general law in a suit between landlord and tenant the question of title to the leased property is irrelevant (2) ILR 2008 Kar 1493 in Sri.Shamrao Rukmnna Talwar Vs. Smt.Suvarna to contend that the landlord who seeks eviction under section 27(2) are need not be an absolute owner of the premises - the word landlord has been defined under the Act, meaning - a person who for the time being is receiving or is entitled to receive the rent of any premises.
Bangalore District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next