Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.33 seconds)

Arulmigu Sankaranarayanasamy vs The Joint Commissioner Of on 8 October, 2007

In fact, even though, the petitioner had filed the judgments of this Court relating to the Thiruchendur Temple, in the said judgment, this Court held that merely because an establishment is an 'industry' within the meaning of Section 2(j) of the Industrial Dispute Act, it will not automatically be covered by the provision of the Payment of Gratuity Act. But on the other hand, the said industry must also come within the meaning of Section 1(3)(b) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
Madras High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - K Chandru - Full Document

M/S.Freight Express International ... vs Additional Commissioner Of Labor on 5 February, 2024

5.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the appellate authority without considering the aforesaid facts rejected the appeal. The learned counsel relied on the Judgment of this Court in Management of Christian Medical College and Hospital Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Labour and Another [W.P.No.15022 of 1999 and WMP.No.21703 of 1999] in support of his submission that the delay in producing the certificate could be condoned.
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1