Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 366 (0.57 seconds)
Documents citing Shail vs Manoj Kumar And Ors on 29 March, 2004

Suraj Singh And Ors vs Ramchandra Singh And Ors on 15 January, 2025

In Shail [Shail v. Manoj Kumar, (2004) 4 SCC 785 : 2004 SCC (Cri) 1401], though reference has been made to Surya Dev Rai [Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai, (2003) 6 SCC 675] , the same is only for the purpose of scope of power under Article 227 as is clear from para 3 of the said judgment. There is no discussion on the issue of maintainability of a petition under Article 226.
Patna High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - M K Shah - Full Document

Kamakhya Narain Singh vs Mahesh Kumar Singh And Anr on 22 November, 2024

In Shail [Shail v. Manoj Kumar, (2004) 4 SCC 785 : 2004 SCC (Cri) 1401], though reference has been made to Surya Dev Rai [Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai, (2003) 6 SCC 675] , the same is only for the purpose of scope of power under Article 227 as is clear from para 3 of the said judgment. There is no discussion on the issue of maintainability of a petition under Article 226.
Patna High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - M K Shah - Full Document

Prabhu Singh And Ors vs Ramkali Devi And Ors on 22 November, 2024

In Shail [Shail v. Manoj Kumar, (2004) 4 SCC 785 : 2004 SCC (Cri) 1401], though reference has been made to Surya Dev Rai [Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai, (2003) 6 SCC 675] , the same Patna High Court CWJC No.19066 of 2015 dt.22-11-2024 9/11 is only for the purpose of scope of power under Article 227 as is clear from para 3 of the said judgment. There is no discussion on the issue of maintainability of a petition under Article 226.
Patna High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - M K Shah - Full Document

Sk. Mintu And Anr vs Sk. Baidullah And Ors on 20 November, 2024

In Shail [Shail v. Manoj Kumar, (2004) 4 SCC 785 : 2004 SCC (Cri) 1401], though reference has been made to Surya Dev Rai [Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai, (2003) 6 SCC 675] , the same is only for the purpose of scope of power under Article 227 as is clear from para 3 of the said judgment. There is no discussion on the issue of maintainability of a petition under Article 226.
Patna High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - M K Shah - Full Document

Rajendra Patel And Ors vs Prithavi Chand Patel And Ors on 25 November, 2024

In Shail [Shail v. Manoj Kumar, (2004) 4 SCC 785 : 2004 SCC (Cri) 1401], though reference has been made to Surya Dev Rai [Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai, (2003) 6 SCC 675] , the same Patna High Court CWJC No.7180 of 2014 dt.25-11-2024 9/11 is only for the purpose of scope of power under Article 227 as is clear from para 3 of the said judgment. There is no discussion on the issue of maintainability of a petition under Article 226.
Patna High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - M K Shah - Full Document

Md. Salauddin And Ors vs Shyara Khatoon on 25 November, 2024

In Shail [Shail v. Manoj Kumar, (2004) 4 SCC 785 : 2004 SCC (Cri) 1401], though reference has been made to Surya Dev Rai [Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai, (2003) 6 SCC 675] , the same is only for the purpose of scope of power under Article 227 as is clear from para 3 of the said judgment. There is no discussion on the issue of maintainability of a petition under Article 226.
Patna High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - M K Shah - Full Document

Sri Gopal Mishra vs Rajat Kumar Banarjee And Ors on 27 November, 2024

In Shail [Shail v. Manoj Kumar, (2004) 4 SCC 785 : 2004 SCC (Cri) 1401], though reference has been made to Surya Dev Rai [Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai, (2003) 6 SCC 675] , the same is only for the purpose of scope of power under Article 227 as is clear from para 3 of the said judgment. There is no discussion on the issue of maintainability of a petition under Article 226.
Patna High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - M K Shah - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next