Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.30 seconds)

Vfs Global Services Private Limited vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation on 11 December, 2015

Delhi High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 2 - V P Vaish - Full Document

Mytrah Energy (India) Private Limited vs Solar Energy Corporation Of India ... on 29 April, 2024

9. Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 has relied upon judgments in cases titled as Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Limited Vs. Indure Private Limited and Anr., 2021 SCC Online Del 3173; Standard Chartered Bank Vs. Heavy Engineering Corporation Limited and Anr., (2020) 13 SCC 574; Techno Unique Infratech Private Limited Vs. Gammon Infrastructure Projects Limited & Ors., (2020) SCC Online Bom 42; Tata Projects Limited Vs. Hazel International FZE, Sharjah and Ors., 2018 SCC Online Born 5858; JCL Infra Limited vs. Government of NCT of Delhi through Chief Secretary and Anr., 2015 SCC Online Del 8156; Himadri Chemicals Industries Limited Vs. Coal Tar Refining Company, (2007) 8 SCC 110; Reliance Salt Limited Vs. Cosmos Enterprises and Anr., (2006) 13 SCC 599; U.P State Sugar Corporation Vs. Sumac International Limited, (1997) 1 SCC 568; Dwarikesh OMP (I) (COMM) 725/24 Page no. 6 of 13 Mytrah Energy (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vfs Global Services Private Limited vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation on 21 March, 2016

13. That apart, in Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. and Anr. (supra), wherein, the reliance was placed by Mr. Sundaram on paras 20 & 21 of the judgment is primarily an exposition of law by this Court. The reliance also placed by him on para 25 of the judgment stating that no injustice would be caused to the defendants, if the bank guarantees are not permitted to be encashed at this stage, subject to the condition they are kept alive by the plaintiff, as, by invocation of the same, the plaintiff would suffer irretrievable injustice and injury because they may not be able to bear such financial imbalance is concerned, suffice to state, this case is distinguishable on facts, inasmuch as, in the said case, it was noted by the Court that the claims of the petitioner in that case, were allowed against the respondents by the domestic adjudicating process prescribed under the terms of the Contract. Further, this court was of the view that the concept of irretrievable injustice or damages or special equities would come into play where a party to a Contract having been provided with internal adjudicative mechanism, attempt to frustrate result of such internal adjudication by recourse to encashment of bank CS(OS) 52/2016 Page 22 of 26 guarantee, particularly when the terms and conditions of the Contract including the terms of the guarantee, such determination is final. There is no final determination in this case as yet, for the plaintiff to take advantage of the case cited. The judgment is also not applicable.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - V K Rao - Full Document
1