Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.28 seconds)

Ms. Shobha Devi vs Union Of India Thru. General Manager, ... on 13 May, 2024

10. So far as the judgment relied by the learned counsel for the appellant in the case of Gaurav Kapoor and Others Vs. Union of India; FAO No.401 of 2010 is concerned, it was admitted position in the said case that deceased had a valid train ticket, which was for travel from New Delhi Railway Station to Ludhiana, therefore, the court held that it can not be said that the deceased was a totally unauthorized passenger though he had boarded a wrong train from the New Delhi Railway Station and had fallen barely about 2/3 kms from New Delhi Railway Station. Thus, the High Court has recorded a finding that once the deceased had a valid journey ticket, albeit for travel from New Delhi to Ludhiana, the deceased is a bonafide passenger within the Explanation (ii) to Section 124-A and he has been held a bonafide passenger and accordingly the appeal was allowed and the matter was remitted. This case is distinguishable on the facts and circumstances of the present case and does not of any benefit to the appellant. In this case no valid ticket has been found with the appellant and learned tribunal has also recorded a finding that it can not be said that the ticket was lost by the appellant and nothing has been argued or shown which may show that the said finding is perverse or erroneous.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - R Kumar - Full Document

Somvati & Ors. vs Union Of India on 9 August, 2017

7. Section 124-A of the Railways Act is based on the principle of no fault liability and the compensation cannot be denied to the appellant on the ground that the deceased was negligent and it is wholly irrelevant as to who was at fault. Section 123(c) of the Railways Act defines 'untoward incident' to include the accidental falling of any passenger from a train carrying passengers. The word 'passenger' has been defined under Section 2 (29) of FAO 482/2013 Page 2 of 10 the Railways Act defines as a person travelling with a valid pass or ticket. The Explanation to Section 124A clarifies that the word 'passenger' includes a railway servant on duty; and a person who has purchased a valid ticket for travelling by a train or a valid platform ticket and becomes a victim of an untoward incident. As such, there are three categories of persons who are defined as passengers: - (i) a person with a valid ticket to travel; (ii) a person who holds a railway pass to travel and (iii) a person who holds a platform ticket. In every one of the categories, so long as a person is in railway premises or a train, he shall be taken as a passenger. His or her presence in the railway premises or a train shall be taken as authorized. It is for this reason that there are decisions which make an extended meaning to the definition passenger to a person who comes into the platform and gets into a wrong train (Gaurav Kapoor v Union of India, (2014) 3 HCC (Del)
Delhi High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - J R Midha - Full Document

Sh. Prithvi Singh And Anr vs Union Of India on 25 May, 2022

In support of his submissions, learned counsel for the appellants has placed reliance on the decisions in Gaurav Kapoor & Ors. v. Union of India reported as 2014 SCC OnLine Del 746, Smt. Anokhi Devi and Others v. Union of India through General Manager, Northern Western Railway, Jaipur reported as 2011 SCC OnLine Raj 1775 and Vaishali v. Union of India reported as 2010 SCC OnLine Bom 921.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - M K Ohri - Full Document
1