Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 232 (3.40 seconds)
Documents citing Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills & Ors vs Tata Air-Craft Ltd on 28 October, 1969

Arun Khanna vs Sumit on 17 December, 2018

"66. There is another aspect of the matter which cannot be lost sight of. If damages cannot be calculated and the terms of the contract provides therefor only for penalty by way of liquidated damages, having regard to the provisions contained in Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act a reasonable sum only could be recovered which need not in all situations even be the sum specified in the contract. (See Maula Bux vs. Union of India and Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills vs. Tata Air Craft Ltd.)
Delhi High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 3 - V J Mehta - Full Document

Rajbir Singh & Anr vs Jaswant Yavdav on 14 May, 2018

"66. There is another aspect of the matter which cannot be lost sight of. If damages cannot be calculated and the terms of the contract provides therefor only for penalty by way of liquidated damages, having regard to the provisions contained in Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act a reasonable sum only could be recovered which need not in all situations even be the sum specified in the contract. (See Maula Bux vs. Union of India and Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills vs. Tata Air Craft Ltd.)
Delhi High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 10 - V J Mehta - Full Document

Anoop Singh vs Gopal Krishan Bhuradia & Anr on 5 July, 2018

"66. There is another aspect of the matter which cannot be lost sight of. If damages cannot be calculated and the terms of the contract provides therefor only for penalty by way of liquidated damages, having regard to the provisions contained in Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act a reasonable sum only could be recovered which need not in all situations even be the sum specified in the contract. (See Maula Bux vs. Union of India and Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills vs. Tata Air Craft Ltd.)
Delhi High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 3 - V J Mehta - Full Document

Sh. Sudesh Kakkar vs Sh. Satish Mittal on 30 July, 2018

"66. There is another aspect of the matter which cannot be lost sight of. If damages cannot be calculated and the terms of the contract provides therefor only for penalty by way of liquidated damages, having regard to the provisions contained in Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act a reasonable sum only could be recovered which need not in all situations even be the sum specified in the contract. (See Maula Bux vs. Union of India and Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills vs. Tata Air Craft Ltd.)
Delhi High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 1 - V J Mehta - Full Document

Shashi vs Naveen Sanghavi on 7 September, 2018

"66. There is another aspect of the matter which cannot be lost sight of. If damages cannot be calculated and the terms of the contract provides therefor only for penalty by way of liquidated damages, having regard to the provisions contained in Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act a reasonable sum only could be recovered which need RFA 215/2016 Page 29 of 33 not in all situations even be the sum specified in the contract. (See Maula Bux vs. Union of India and Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills vs. Tata Air Craft Ltd.)
Delhi High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - V J Mehta - Full Document

Kamal Jeet vs Sneh Lata Chaturvedi (Deceased Through ... on 11 May, 2018

"66. There is another aspect of the matter which cannot be lost sight of. If damages cannot be calculated and the terms of the contract provides therefor only for penalty by way of liquidated damages, having regard to the provisions contained in Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act a reasonable sum only could be recovered which need not in all situations even be the sum specified in the contract. (See Maula Bux vs. Union of India and Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills vs. Tata Air Craft Ltd.)
Delhi High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 1 - V J Mehta - Full Document

M.C. Luthra vs Ashok Kumar Khanna on 27 February, 2018

"66. There is another aspect of the matter which cannot be lost sight of. If damages cannot be calculated and the terms of the contract provides therefor only for penalty by way of liquidated damages, having regard to the provisions contained in Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act a reasonable sum only could be recovered which need not in all situations even be the sum specified in the contract. (See Maula Bux vs. Union of India and Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills vs. Tata Air Craft Ltd.)
Delhi High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 64 - V J Mehta - Full Document

Rakesh Kumar Vats vs Vinod Kumar Chahel on 9 July, 2018

"66. There is another aspect of the matter which cannot be lost sight of. If damages cannot be calculated and the terms of the contract provides therefor only for penalty by way of liquidated damages, having regard to the provisions contained in Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act a reasonable sum only could be recovered which need not in all situations even be the sum specified in the contract. (See Maula Bux vs. Union of India and Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills vs. Tata Air Craft Ltd.)
Delhi High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 7 - V J Mehta - Full Document

Vandana Jain vs Rita Mathur And Ors. on 20 April, 2018

"66. There is another aspect of the matter which cannot be lost sight of. If damages cannot be calculated and the terms of the contract provides therefor only for penalty by way of liquidated damages, having regard to the provisions contained in Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act a reasonable sum only could be recovered which need not in all situations even be the sum specified in the contract. (See Maula RFA No.38/2018 Page 29 of 33 Bux vs. Union of India and Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills vs. Tata Air Craft Ltd.)
Delhi High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 29 - V J Mehta - Full Document

Sh. Pramod Kumar Jain vs Dr. Raman Kumar Juneja on 27 September, 2018

"66. There is another aspect of the matter which cannot be lost sight of. If damages cannot be calculated and the terms of the contract provides therefore only for penalty by way of liquidated damages, having regard to the provisions contained in Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act a reasonable sum only could be recovered which need not in all situations even be the sum specified in the contract. (See Maula Bux v. Union of India and Shree Hanuman cotton Mills v. Tata Air Crat Ltd.)
Delhi District Court Cites 38 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next