Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.59 seconds)
Documents citing Sandeep Shahi vs Smt Asha Rani on 7 September, 2010

Smt. Usha Rani vs Smt. Usha Rani From The Court Of on 19 December, 2013

Petitioner wife has filed the present transfer application under Section 24 CPC for the transfer of petition filed by respondent husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955 (for short "the Act") titled Sandeep Kumar Vs. Smt. Usha Rani from the Court of learned Addl. District Judge, Chandigarh to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Ambala.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - J Singh - Full Document

Narinder Singh vs Indu Dhir on 29 January, 2019

From the submissions of learned counsel for the revision petitioner, it appears that revision petitioner is no more denying the relationship of landlord and tenant with the respondent but seeking an opportunity to tender the rent with the plea that the denial of relationship was a bona fide act on the part of revision petitioner. On this issue, learned Rent Controller has relied on the observations in case of Sandeep Shahi Vs. Smt. Asha Rani 2010 (4) Law Herald (P&H) 2787, wherein it was observed that in case, tenant has denied the relationship of landlord and tenant, the Rent Controller is not required to make provisional assessment of rent payable by the tenant or is required to give opportunity to the tenant to pay the rent and the observation in case of Raghbir Singh and others Vs. Sansar Chand and others, 2004(2) R.C.R. (Rent) 670.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - S Gupta - Full Document

M/S. Laxmi Traders And Another vs Kushal Pal Singh Mann on 10 September, 2010

Again, this Court in Sandeep Shahi Vs. Smt. Asha Rani (CR No.1595 of 2009, decided on 7.9.2010, while placing reliance on the earlier judgements of this Court in Raghbir Singh (supra) and Hukma Devi (supra), has held that once relationship of landlord - tenant is denied between the parties, neither assessment nor opportunity is required to be given to the tenant to deposit arrears of rent.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - A Singh - Full Document

S.K. Kalia vs Om Parkash And Others on 20 September, 2010

This Court in the matter of Sandeep Shahi Vs. Smt Asha Rani (C.R. No.1595 of 2009, decided on 7.9.2010), after relying upon the judgements rendered by this Court in Raghbir Singh and others Vs. Sansar Chand and others, reported in 2004(3) PLR 841, and in Hukma Devi Vs. Bhagwan Dass, reported in 2003(1) RCR(Rent) 533, held that if relationship of landlord - tenant is denied by the tenant, then the Rent Controller is not supposed to assess the rent and to give an opportunity to the tenant to tender the rent.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 3 - A Singh - Full Document

Rajinder Kumar vs Leela Devi on 4 February, 2015

On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that once the tenant denies the relationship of landlord and tenant, he does so at his own risk and if at final stage, Court comes to the conclusion that the relationship of landlord-tenant was wrongly denied, eviction would follow and no opportunity could be given to tenant to make good the deficiency in arrears of rent. He has also relied upon a judgment of this Court in the case of Sandeep Shahi Vs. Smt. Asha Rani, 2010 (2) R.C.R.(Rent),500.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - R K Jain - Full Document
1   2 Next