Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 47 (2.06 seconds)
Documents citing Kona Prabhakara Rao vs M. Seshagiri Rao And Anr. on 9 April, 1980

Mopuragundu Thippeswamy, Ananthapur ... vs K.Eranna, Ananthapur Dist. 10 Others on 27 November, 2018

(2) The allegations in the election petition should not be vague, general in nature or lacking of materials or frivolous or vexatious because the court is empowered at any stage of the proceedings to strike down or delete pleadings which are suffering from such vices as not raising any triable issue vide Manphul Singh v. Surinder Singh [(1973) 2 SCC 599: (1974) 1 SCR 52], Kona Prabhakara Rao v. M. Seshagiri Rao [(1982) 1 SCC 442] and Dhartipakar Madan Lal Agarwal v. Rajiv Gandhi [1987 Supp SCC 93] .
Telangana High Court Cites 59 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Prakash Rajaram Surve vs Udesh Shantaram Patekar on 1 August, 2025

(2) The allegations in the election petition should not be vague, general in nature or lacking of materials or frivolous or vexatious because the court is empowered at any stage of the proceedings to strike down or delete pleadings which are suffering from such vices as not raising any triable issue vide Manphul Singh v. Surinder Singh [(1973) 2 SCC 599 : (1974) 1 SCR 52], Kona Prabhakara Rao v. M. Seshagiri Page No.40 of 81 1 August 2025 ::: Uploaded on - 01/08/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 02/08/2025 10:12:17 ::: Neeta Sawant AEP-3-2025 in EP-10-2024-FC Rao [(1982) 1 SCC 442] and Dhartipakar Madan Lal Agarwal v. Rajiv Gandhi [1987 Supp SCC 93].
Bombay High Court Cites 70 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Capt R Tamil Selvan vs Ganesh Kumar Yadav on 18 August, 2025

(2) The allegations in the election petition should not be vague, general in nature or lacking of materials or frivolous or vexatious because the court is empowered at any stage of the proceedings to strike down or delete pleadings which are suffering from such vices as not raising any triable issue vide Manphul Singh v. Surinder Singh [(1973) 2 SCC 599 : (1974) 1 SCR 52], Kona Prabhakara Rao v. M. Seshagiri Rao [(1982) 1 SCC 442] and Dhartipakar Madan Lal Agarwal v. Rajiv Gandhi [1987 Supp SCC 93].
Bombay High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - M N Jadhav - Full Document

Ganesh Kumar Yadav vs Capt. R. Tamil Selvan on 18 August, 2025

(2) The allegations in the election petition should not be vague, general in nature or lacking of materials or frivolous or vexatious because the court is empowered at any stage of the proceedings to strike down or delete pleadings which are suffering from such vices as not raising any triable issue vide Manphul Singh v. Surinder Singh [(1973) 2 SCC 599 : (1974) 1 SCR 52], Kona Prabhakara Rao v. M. Seshagiri Rao [(1982) 1 SCC 442] and Dhartipakar Madan Lal Agarwal v. Rajiv Gandhi [1987 Supp SCC 93].
Bombay High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - M N Jadhav - Full Document

Nayana Manoj Vasani vs Narendra Lalchand Mehta on 24 March, 2026

(2) The allegations in the election petition should not be vague, general in nature or lacking of materials or frivolous or vexatious because the court is empowered at any stage of the proceedings to strike down or delete pleadings which are suffering from such vices as not raising any triable issue vide Manphul Singh v. Surinder Singh [(1973) 2 SCC 599: (1974) 1 SCR 52], Kona Prabhakara Rao v. M. Seshagiri Rao [(1982) 1 SCC 442] and Dhartipakar Madan Lal Agarwal v. Rajiv Gandhi [1987 Supp SCC 93].
Bombay High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Narendra Lalchand Mehta vs Nayana Manoj Vasani on 24 March, 2026

(2) The allegations in the election petition should not be vague, general in nature or lacking of materials or frivolous or vexatious because the court is empowered at any stage of the proceedings to strike down or delete pleadings which are suffering from such vices as not raising any triable issue vide Manphul Singh v. Surinder Singh [(1973) 2 SCC 599: (1974) 1 SCR 52], Kona Prabhakara Rao v. M. Seshagiri Rao [(1982) 1 SCC 442] and Dhartipakar Madan Lal Agarwal v. Rajiv Gandhi [1987 Supp SCC 93].
Bombay High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Harishchandra Sakharam Bhoye vs Sunil (Bhau) Chandrakant Bhusara on 30 March, 2026

(2) The allegations in the election petition should not be vague, general in nature or lacking of materials or frivolous or vexatious because the court is empowered at any stage of the proceedings to strike down or delete pleadings which are suffering from such vices as not raising any triable issue vide Manphul Singh v. Surinder Singh [(1973) 2 SCC 599 : (1974) 1 SCR 52], Kona Prabhakara Rao v. M. Seshagiri Rao [(1982) 1 SCC 442] and Dhartipakar Madan Lal Agarwal v. Rajiv Gandhi [1987 Supp SCC 93].
Bombay High Court Cites 67 - Cited by 0 - M N Jadhav - Full Document

Chief Electoral Officer General ... vs Sunil (Bhau) Chandrakant Bhusara And ... on 30 March, 2026

(2) The allegations in the election petition should not be vague, general in nature or lacking of materials or frivolous or vexatious because the court is empowered at any stage of the proceedings to strike down or delete pleadings which are suffering from such vices as not raising any triable issue vide Manphul Singh v. Surinder Singh [(1973) 2 SCC 599 : (1974) 1 SCR 52], Kona Prabhakara Rao v. M. Seshagiri Rao [(1982) 1 SCC 442] and Dhartipakar Madan Lal Agarwal v. Rajiv Gandhi [1987 Supp SCC 93].
Bombay High Court Cites 67 - Cited by 0 - M N Jadhav - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next