citedby: 3832717

Maya @ Mahendra Mukund Kamble vs The State Of Maharashtra on 19 June, 2023

The High Court of Calcutta in the case of Ranjit Rajbanshi Vs. State of West Bengal has the court found serious discrepancies in evidence of witness and that prosecution failed to raise presumption under Section 29 of POCSO Act. All these decisions are not applicable to the facts of the present case.

Bombay High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - P D Naik - Full Document

Vishwanath Ahirwar vs State Of U.P. on 27 April, 2023

In Ranjit Rajbanshi Vs. State of West Bengal (supra) cited by learned counsel for the appellant, accused was convicted and sentenced by learned trial court under Section 376(1) IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act while allowing appeal and setting aside the conviction observed as under:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 38 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rupesh Parshuram Fulare vs The State Of Maharashtra on 19 June, 2023

The High Court of Calcutta in the case of Ranjit Rajbanshi Vs. State of West Bengal has the court found serious discrepancies in evidence of witness and that prosecution failed to raise presumption under Section 29 of POCSO Act. All these decisions are not applicable to the facts of the present case.

Bombay High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - P D Naik - Full Document

Rupesh Parshuram Fulare vs The State Of Maharashtra on 19 June, 2023

The High Court of Calcutta in the case of Ranjit Rajbanshi Vs. State of West Bengal has the court found serious discrepancies in evidence of witness and that prosecution failed to raise presumption under Section 29 of POCSO Act. All these decisions are not applicable to the facts of the present case.

Bombay High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - P D Naik - Full Document

Shri Teiborlang Kurkalang & Anr. vs . State Of Meghalaya & Anr. on 23 March, 2022

16. The decisions cited by the learned counsel for the petitioners in this regard appears to be relevant, in the case of Ranjit Rajbanshi (supra) at paragraphs 47, 48 & 49, the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court has held as under:

Meghalaya High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 6 - W Diengdoh - Full Document

Shri. Shembhalang Rynghang & Anr. vs . State Of Meghalaya on 23 March, 2022

22. The decisions cited by the learned counsel for the petitioners in this regard appears to be relevant, in the case of Ranjit Rajbanshi (supra) at paragraphs 47, 48 & 49, the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court has held as under:

Meghalaya High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 2 - W Diengdoh - Full Document

Shri Eldon Khongmawloh vs . State Of Meghalaya on 23 March, 2022

In the case of Ranjit Rajbanshi (supra) at paragraphs 47, 48 & 49, the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court has held as under:

Meghalaya High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - W Diengdoh - Full Document

Shri. Olius Mawiong & Anr. vs . State Of Meghalaya & Anr. on 19 July, 2022

20. The ratio in the case of Teiborlang Kurkalang was arrived at by following the precedent laid down in cases of similar nature, particularly the case of Ranjit Rajbanshi (supra) also relied upon by the petitioners wherein at para 47, 48 and 49 of the same, the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court has opined as follows:

Meghalaya High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 22 - W Diengdoh - Full Document

Shri. Pyniarlang Kurkalang & Anr. vs . State Of Meghalaya & Anr. on 2 August, 2022

In the case of Ranjit Rajbanshi (supra) at paragraphs 47, 48 & 49 of the same, the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court while dealing with the technical aspect of the POCSO Act, particularly Section 3 (a) has observed that an 7 accused cannot be said to be guilty of penetrative sexual assault if the act is a participatory moment of passion involving the participation of both the victim and the accused.

Meghalaya High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - W Diengdoh - Full Document

Shri. Kwantar Khongsit & 2 Ors. vs . State Of Meghalaya & 4 Ors. on 10 August, 2022

15. At para 17 of the same has cited with approval the case of Ranjit Rajbanshi v. State of West Bengal & Ors. C.R.A. No. 458 of 2018 wherein the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court at para 47, 48 and 49 has observed as under:-

Meghalaya High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 2 - W Diengdoh - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results