Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.29 seconds)
Documents citing M.D. Sharma And Anr. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 29 March, 2001

Samar Pal Rana vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 17 August, 2018

In view of the discussion undertaken by us, we hold that the judgment rendered by the Division Bench in D. S. Dagar's case does not represent the correct legal position, and that the one in D. M. sharma's case accords with the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on the subject. As a result, we dismiss the OAs. There shall be no order as to costs.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Alok Kumar vs M/O Personnel,Public Grievances And ... on 17 August, 2018

In view of the discussion undertaken by us, we hold that the judgment rendered by the Division Bench in D. S. Dagar's case does not represent the correct legal position, and that the one in D. M. sharma's case accords with the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on the subject. As a result, we dismiss the OAs. There shall be no order as to costs.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajeev Kumar Chadha vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 3 January, 2024

In view of the discussion undertaken by us, we hold that the judgment rendered by the Division Bench in D. S. Dagar's case does not represent the correct legal position and that the one in D. M. sharma's case accords with the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on the subject. As a result, we dismiss the OAs. There shall be no order as to costs."
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ramesh Kumar vs M/O Railway on 17 October, 2024

3. As per the averments made by the applicant, recently he came to know from his colleague that there is a provision for grant of compassionate allowance in case of removal or dismissal from service. Referring to the provisions of Rule 65 (1) of the Railway Service (Pension) Rules 1993 and Railway Board RBE No. 164/2008 (Annex.A/3), the applicant submits that he has not committed any misconduct involving moral turpitude. He fulfilled all the parameters laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the matter of M.D. Sharma Vs. UOI & Ors. reported in (2014) SCC 684.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jodhpur Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1