Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.85 seconds)
Documents citing 1) Dr. B. Satish Kumar, S/O B. R. ... vs Union Of India, Represented By Its ... on 24 August, 2017

K. Kamalakar Rao, Warangal Dist Another vs Secretary, Ministry Of Home Affairs, ... on 28 August, 2018

28. As brought out by this Court in its decision in Dr. B. Satish Kumar v. Union of India, to which one of us (VRS,J) was a party, the erstwhile State of Hyderabad comprised of three linguistic areas, viz., Telangana, Maratwada and Karnataka. In the year 1919, Nizam 19 HCJ & VRS, J W.P.Nos.23267 of 2017 & batch issued a Firman promulgating the Mulki Rules, which provide for requirement of residence in the State for fifteen years as an essential qualification for public employment. These Rules were contained in Appendix-N to the Hyderabad Civil Services Regulations.
Telangana High Court Cites 75 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Govt Teachers Assn 8 Ors. vs Secy., Min. Of Home Affairs, New Delhi 3 ... on 28 August, 2018

28. As brought out by this Court in its decision in Dr. B. Satish Kumar v. Union of India, to which one of us (VRS,J) was a party, the erstwhile State of Hyderabad comprised of three linguistic areas, viz., Telangana, Maratwada and Karnataka. In the year 1919, Nizam 19 HCJ & VRS, J W.P.Nos.23267 of 2017 & batch issued a Firman promulgating the Mulki Rules, which provide for requirement of residence in the State for fifteen years as an essential qualification for public employment. These Rules were contained in Appendix-N to the Hyderabad Civil Services Regulations.
Telangana High Court Cites 75 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Govt.Teachers Assn., Hyderabad, 8 ... vs The Union Of India, Home,New Delhi, 3 ... on 28 August, 2018

28. As brought out by this Court in its decision in Dr. B. Satish Kumar v. Union of India, to which one of us (VRS,J) was a party, the erstwhile State of Hyderabad comprised of three linguistic areas, viz., Telangana, Maratwada and Karnataka. In the year 1919, Nizam 19 HCJ & VRS, J W.P.Nos.23267 of 2017 & batch issued a Firman promulgating the Mulki Rules, which provide for requirement of residence in the State for fifteen years as an essential qualification for public employment. These Rules were contained in Appendix-N to the Hyderabad Civil Services Regulations.
Telangana High Court Cites 75 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Government Teachers Association, ... vs Union Of India, Represented By Its ... on 28 August, 2018

28. As brought out by this Court in its decision in Dr. B. Satish Kumar v. Union of India, to which one of us (VRS,J) was a party, the erstwhile State of Hyderabad comprised of three linguistic areas, viz., Telangana, Maratwada and Karnataka. In the year 1919, Nizam issued a Firman promulgating the Mulki Rules, which provide for requirement of residence in the State for fifteen years as an essential qualification for public employment. These Rules were contained in Appendix-N to the Hyderabad Civil Services Regulations.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 75 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

B Radhakumari vs M/O Mines on 24 January, 2020

4. The contentions of the applicant are that she has completed 32 years of service, hence, she is entitled for the benefits under ACP and MACP Schemes. The applicant was initially appointed on ad hoc basis but later it was regularized without any break in service. Hence, the applicant is eligible for the benefits, which could be extended by counting the ad hoc service and also keeping in view the Judgement delivered by the Principal Bench in the case of Satish Kumar v. Secretary, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare & Others [OA No.3184/2010, decided on 27.01.2012].
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next