Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.38 seconds)

Kushal Kumar Das vs M/O Railways on 11 September, 2017

é. In view of The fact that applicant's appeal was not snsidered on technical grourid ana also the grevance of the aoplicant that he has been deprived of his 30 years of service and Two promotions and also in view of the above observation of fre Hon'ble Supreme Coun in Jal Bhagwan {supra}, we direct the appellate authority fo treat this OA as an appeal aiong with fresh representation jo be fled by the applicant within 15 day ts from the date of the receipt of this order and decide the appeal an ments keeping In view fhe culpability of the applicant and against why je-giving ihe punishments The eg appellate authority will pass appropriate orders with disoatch criminated aiier going info the records of the case as well as giving Oopporiunily of being heard fo the applicant at the earliest but £ Sos ese a ew Page 6 of ?
Central Administrative Tribunal - Gauhati Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Prem Singh S/O Shri Kedar Singh vs Delhi Transport Corporation Through ... on 11 October, 2006

This Court in DTC v. Bal Kishan and Anr. 123 (2005) DLT 596 and in Jal Singh v. Commissioner of Police and Ors. 2001(7)AD Delhi 712 held that the regularization of the absence as 'leave without pay' would not absolve the delinquent of the misconduct and the order of dismissal does not suffer from any illegality. The regularisation of absence as 'leave without pay' is normally done for the purpose of maintaining a correct record of the duration of service and adjustment of leave due. This does not discharge an employee from misconduct. In the present case the petitioner remained absent within a period of 04 months for 71 days without sanctioned leave and his absence was treated as 'leave without pay' but that did not absolve him of the misconduct.
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S N Dhingra - Full Document
1