Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.25 seconds)

Shiv Prakash Gupta vs The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd on 25 May, 2016

16. The Divisional Manager, L.I.C. vs. Uma Devi, 1991 (1) CPR 662 (NC), esa ekuuh; jk"Vªh; vk;ksx }kjk ;g fu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd%& "8. The very fact that the Insurance Act provides for a machinery for remedy for grievances arising out of repudiation of a claim under section 45 leads to show that the Corporation has to satisfy a Court that the repudiation was justified. Accordingly, it is for the consumer to choose a forum convenient to him to seek remedy for the loss suffered because of deficiency in service. As the provisions of this Act are in addition to and not in derogation of any other law for the time being in force, the State Commission has the jurisdiction to entertain the complaint and to investigate whether the repudiation was justified or not and to grant such relief as deems fit if it is satisfied that there was deficiency in service.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1