Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 74 (1.18 seconds)
Documents citing U.T.Administration,Chandigarh & Ors vs Manju Mathur & Anr on 14 January, 2011

State Of Punjab And Ors vs Jagjit Singh And Ors on 26 October, 2016

(xiv) For parity in pay-scales, under the principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’, equation in the nature of duties, is of paramount importance. If the principal nature of duties of one post is teaching, whereas that of the other is non-teaching, the principle would not be applicable. If the dominant nature of duties of one post is of control and management, whereas the subject post has no such duties, the principle would not be applicable. Likewise, if the central nature of duties of one post is of quality control, whereas the subject post has minimal duties of quality control, the principle would not be applicable (see - Union Territory Administration, Chandigarh v. Manju Mathur15).
Supreme Court of India Cites 54 - Cited by 2405 - J S Khehar - Full Document

State Of Punjab vs Jagjit Singh on 26 October, 2016

(xiv) For parity in pay-scales, under the principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’, equation in the nature of duties, is of paramount importance. If the principal nature of duties of one post is teaching, whereas that of the other is non- teaching, the principle would not be applicable. If the dominant nature of duties of one post is of control and management, whereas the subject post has no such duties, the principle would not be applicable. Likewise, if the central nature of duties of one post is of quality control, whereas the subject post has minimal duties of quality control, the principle would not be applicable (see - Union Territory Administration, Chandigarh v. Manju Mathur15).
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 57 - Cited by 0 - J S Khehar - Full Document

Mohd. Ramjan & Another vs State Of U.P. & Others on 12 December, 2018

42.14 For parity in pay-scales, under the principle of 'equal pay for equal work', equation in the nature of duties, is of paramount importance. If the principal nature of duties of one post is teaching, whereas that of the other is non-teaching, the principle would not be applicable. If the dominant nature of duties of one post is of control and management, whereas the subject post has no such duties, the principle would not be applicable. Likewise, if the central nature of duties of one post is of quality control, whereas the subject post has minimal duties of quality control, the principle would not be applicable (see-Union Territory Administration, Chandigarh v. Manju Mathur : (2011) 2 SCC 452).
Allahabad High Court Cites 47 - Cited by 1 - S Agarwal - Full Document

Kishan Pilley vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 28 April, 2017

42.14. For parity in pay-scales, under the principle of 'equal pay for equal work', equation in the nature of duties, is of paramount importance. If the principal nature of duties of one post is teaching, whereas that of the other is non-teaching, the principle would not be applicable. If the dominant nature of duties of one post is of control and management, whereas the subject post has no such duties, the principle would not be applicable. Likewise, if the central nature of duties of one post is of quality control, whereas the subject post has minimal duties of quality control, the principle would not be applicable (see - Union Territory Administration, Chandigarh v. Manju Mathur).
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 2 - S K Gangele - Full Document

Farooq Ahmad Janda vs Union Of India Through Secretary on 1 March, 2025

42.14. For parity in pay-scales, under the principle of 'equal pay for equal work', equation in the nature of duties, is of paramount importance. If the principal nature of duties of one post is teaching, whereas that of the other is non-teaching, the principle would not be applicable. If the dominant nature of duties of one post is of control and management, whereas the subject post has no such duties, the principle would not be applicable. Likewise, if the central nature of duties of one post is of quality control, whereas the subject post has minimal duties of quality control, the principle would not be applicable (see - Union Territory Administration, Chandigarh v. Manju Mathur).
Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Das Bakuleshkumar Bachubhai vs Govt Of India on 20 March, 2025

(xiv) For parity in pay-scales, under the principle of `equal pay for equal work', equation in the nature of duties, is of paramount importance. If the principal nature of duties of one post is teaching, whereas that of the other is nonteaching, the principle would not be applicable. If the dominant nature of duties of one post is of control and management, whereas the subject post has no such duties, the principle would not be applicable. Likewise, if the central nature of duties of one post is of quality control, whereas the subject post has minimal duties of quality control, the principle would not be applicable (see - Union Territory Administration, Chandigarh v. Manju Mathur, 2011(1) S.C.T. 830 : (2011) 2 SCC 452).
Gujarat High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - V Nanavati - Full Document

Gujarat Rajya Pachhat Varqa ... vs State Of Gujarat on 29 July, 2022

(xiv) For parity in pay-scales, under the principle of 'equal pay for equal work', equation in the nature of duties, is of paramount importance. If the principal nature of duties of one post is teaching, whereas that of the other is non-teaching, the principle would not be applicable. If the dominant nature of duties of one post is of control and management, whereas the subject post has no such duties, the principle would not be applicable. Likewise, if the central nature of duties of one post is of quality control, whereas the subject post has minimal duties of quality control, the principle would not be applicable (see - Union Territory Administration, Chandigarh v. Manju Mathur).
Gujarat High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 1 - B D Karia - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next