Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.30 seconds)

Jamunaprasad Jagdishprasad Shukla vs State Of Gujarat on 23 January, 2025

8. The appellant has relied upon the judgments in Gautambhai Babarbhai Shantibhai Patel versus State of Gujarat [2012 (2) GLR 1073] and Rameshbhai Jayendrabhai Modi versus State of Gujarat [2013 (5) GLR 4317]. However, the facts and circumstances of the present case are distinguishable. The reliance on these Page 5 of 7 Uploaded by M.H. DAVE(HC00193) on Tue Jan 28 2025 Downloaded on : Tue Jan 28 21:29:10 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION R/SCR.A/940/2025 ORDER DATED: 23/01/2025 undefined citations does not substantiate the appellant's claim of tampering or the necessity of forensic analysis at the appellate stage."
Gujarat High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Amitkumar Kiritbhai Doshi vs State Of Gujarat & on 28 April, 2017

5.4  It was inter alia observed in Gautambhai Patel (supra),  that since   the  contention  of the accused  was  that the  cheques  in question  did not   belong to him and the same  were not drawn from his bank account,  if   such fact is proved, it may end up with a situation where the accused may   not be convicted. It was, therefore, reasoned that when the accused wanted   to bring such important aspect by leading further evidence, the same was   required   to   be   granted.   In   that   case   also,   it   was   specific   case   of   the   applicant­accused in his further statement recorded under Section 313 of   the Code that cheques did not belong to him.
Gujarat High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 1 - J B Pardiwala - Full Document

Devangbhai Harshadbhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat & on 4 March, 2016

In support of his contention he has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Gautambhai Bababhai @ Shantibhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat & Anr. 2012(2) 1073 and in the case of Jayanti Parshottam Machhi @ Jayanti Parshottam Tandel Vs State of Gujarat & Anr. 2015(3) GLR 1978 and in the decision of Rajendra Prasad Vs Narcotic Cell, AIR 1999 (40) SC 496, and in State(NCT of Delhi) Vs Shiv Kumar Yadav and Anr. (2016) SCC 402 and in the case of Shailendra Kumar Vs. State of Bihar 2001(1) GLHEL SX Page 2 of 4 HC-NIC Page 2 of 4 Created On Mon Mar 14 00:11:56 IST 2016 R/CR.RA/107/2016 ORDER 25937 and has urged that the present application requires consideration.
Gujarat High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - A G Uraizee - Full Document
1