Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.04 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Haryana vs Prince And Others on 16 November, 2017

State vs Prince on 5 June, 2025

8. During cross-examination of the witness by Ld. Counsel for the accused persons, PW-3 admitted that he had not told the police officials at the time of recording of his statement regarding the total number of locks which he had put in his shop and which had been broken. He admitted that he had not seen any of the accused breaking the locks of his shop. He admitted that FIR was not lodged on my complaint. He denied that no one had told him that accused persons had broken the locks and due to said fact he had not mentioned in his examination-in-chief, the name of the person who had so told him. The police officials had prepared site plan in State Vs. Prince and Ors.
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Prince on 16 September, 2023

16.The bail bonds, if any, furnished by accused persons at the time of commencement of trail stands canceled. Surety, if any stands discharged. Documents, if any shall be returned to its rightful owner as per rules. Endorsement, if any stands canceled. Case property if State Vs. Prince & Ors. FIR No. 551/2021, PS Uttam Nagar, Judgment dated 16.09.2023 Page No. 8 of 9 any, shall be disposed off after expiration of period to assail this judgment and in case of appeal, as per the directions of Ld. Appellate Court. Case file be consigned to record room after due compliance.
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Prince And 9 Others vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 2 September, 2025

8. Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Krishnappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka; 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 529, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and another; 2017 9 SCC 641, B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; 2003(4) SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Burea of Investigation and another; (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 677, Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab; (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another; (2014) Supreme Today 642, the proceeding of Criminal Case No.14437 of 2023 (State Vs. Prince and others), arising out of Case Crime No.34 of 2023, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 323, 504, 506, 325 IPC, Police Station Ankur Vihar, District Gramin (Commissionerate Ghaziabad), pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1, Ghaziabad, is hereby quashed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - D Verma - Full Document

Smt. Shivani Singh Alias Juhi Singh vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 28 April, 2022

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, it would be appropriate to transfer Criminal Case No. 3953 of 2019 (State Vs. Prince Pal & Others) arising out of Case Crime No. 118 of 2019 under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, P.S. Lalaganj, District Basti pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Basti from District Basti to District Gorakhpur.
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - A K Ojha - Full Document

Balbir Singh Dhol vs State Of Punjab on 26 May, 2022

Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for seeking quashing of the order dated 17.05.2022 (Annexure P-3) passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, SAS Nagar Mohali in case titled as 'State versus Prince and others' vide which application dated 09.05.2022 filed by the petitioner seeking permission to go abroad for a period of 01 month commencing from 30.05.2022 till 30.06.2022 has been dismissed. A further prayer has been sought to grant permission to the petitioner to go abroad for the said period.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Prince Thakur And 6 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 18 January, 2021

At this stage, the learned counsel for the applicants made a prayer that the bail application of the applicants in Special Session Trial No. 50/2020, State Vs. Prince Thakur and others, arising out of case crime no. 111/19, under Sections 147, 323, 504 IPC and under Section 3(2) (va), 3(1) (Dha) of SC/ST Act, P.S. Sahatwar, District Ballia, may be ordered to be considered expeditiously, if possible, on the same day by the concerned Court below where the said case is pending.
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - P Bhatia - Full Document

Prince And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 18 April, 2023

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the charge-sheet dated 09.11.2021 and cognizance/ summoning order dated 21.12.2021 as well as entire proceedings of Case No. 6854 of 2021 (State Vs. Prince and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 344 of 2021, under Sections 406, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Chhibramau, District Kannauj, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chhibramau, Kannauj.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - R Gupta - Full Document

Prince And 9 Others vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 27 May, 2024

2. The present application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the charge dated 09.10.2023 as well as the cognizance order dated 04.12.2023 and the entire proceedings of Case No. 14437 of 2023 (State vs. Prince and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 34 of 2023, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 323, 504, 506, 325 IPC, Police Station- Ankur Vihar, District- Gramin (Commissionerate Ghaziabad), pursuant to compromise deed dated 29.08.2023.
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - V Varma - Full Document
1   2 3 Next