Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.83 seconds)
Documents citing Smt.P. Urmila Devi vs Directorate Of Education, Gnct, Delhi on 2 July, 2010

Amarjit Singh @ Bittu vs State Of Punjab And Another on 22 December, 2010

Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Smt. Urmila Devi v. The State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) 2007(1) RCR (Criminal) 247 held that in the case where the co-accused have been acquitted, it would not be in the interest of justice to permit the accused to be subjected to a trial when the end result is more than clear and subjecting the accused to trial would be an exercise in futility.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mr. Gautam Singh vs State Of Punjab And Another on 24 January, 2011

Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Smt. Urmila Devi v. The State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) 2007(1) RCR (Criminal) 247 held that in the case where the co-accused have been acquitted, it would not be in the interest of justice to permit the accused to be subjected to a trial when the end result is more than clear and subjecting the accused to trial would be an exercise in futility.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Charanjit Kaur vs State Of Punjab And Another on 16 February, 2011

Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Smt. Urmila Devi v. The State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) 2007(1) RCR (Criminal) 247 held that in the case where the co-accused have been acquitted, it would not be in the CRM M-35382 of 2010 -3- interest of justice to permit the accused to be subjected to a trial when the end result is more than clear and subjecting the accused to trial would be an exercise in futility.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Tilak Raj Sharma vs State Of Punjab And Others on 28 February, 2011

Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Smt. Urmila Devi v. The State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) 2007(1) RCR (Criminal) 247 held that in the case where the co-accused have been acquitted, it would not be in the interest of justice to permit the accused to be subjected to a trial when the end result is more than clear and subjecting the accused to trial would be an exercise in futility.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kulwinder Singh vs State Of Punjab And Another on 4 March, 2011

Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Smt. Urmila Devi v. The State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) 2007(1) RCR (Criminal) 247 held that in the case where the co-accused have been acquitted, it would not be in the interest of justice to permit the accused to be subjected to a trial when the end result is more than clear and subjecting the accused to trial would be an exercise in futility.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kulwinder Singh @ Kinder vs State Of Punjab And Another on 4 March, 2011

Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Smt. Urmila Devi v. The State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) 2007(1) RCR (Criminal) 247 held that in the case where the co-accused have been acquitted, it would not be in the interest of justice to permit the accused to be subjected to a trial when the end result is more than clear and subjecting the accused to trial would be an exercise in futility.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Kulwinder Singh @ Bobby vs State Of Punjab And Another on 9 March, 2011

Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Smt. Urmila Devi v. The State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) 2007(1) RCR (Criminal) 247 held that in the case where the co-accused have been acquitted, it would not be in the interest of justice to permit the accused to be subjected to a trial when the end result is more than clear and subjecting the accused to trial would be an exercise in futility.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pawan Kumar Singh vs State Of Punjab And Another on 18 March, 2011

Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Smt. Urmila Devi v. The State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) 2007(1) RCR (Criminal) 247 held that in the case where the co-accused have been acquitted, it would not be in the interest of justice to permit the accused to be subjected to a trial when the end result is more than clear and subjecting the accused to trial would be an exercise in futility.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Tejinder Singh @ Manga vs State Of Punjab And Others on 25 March, 2011

Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Smt. Urmila Devi v. The State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) 2007(1) RCR (Criminal) 247 held that in the case where the co-accused have been acquitted, it would not be in the interest of justice to permit the accused to be subjected to a trial when the end result is more than clear and subjecting the accused to trial would be an exercise in futility.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Dharminder Kumar vs State Of Punjab And Another on 21 March, 2011

Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Smt. Urmila Devi v. The State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) 2007(1) RCR (Criminal) 247 held that in the case where the co-accused have been acquitted, it would not be in the interest of justice to permit the accused to be subjected to a trial when the end result is more than clear and subjecting the accused to trial would be an exercise in futility.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1