Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.69 seconds)

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Rajesh Kumar on 14 July, 2023

There is no reason to consider the version of the Respondent Insurance Company to rely on the judgement of the Hon'ble National Commission in P. Khamar Pasha Vs Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. in Revision Petition No. 724. In the present case the reputation on the ground of delay in intimating the claim is unacceptable. The complainant in its complaint had stated clearly that he had intimated about the theft of the vehicle immediately to the police and in this regard the police had filed its final report in the and the Court of ACJM had accepted the report on 12.04.2014 Therefore, there is no question of doubting the theft of the vehicle.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajesh Kumar vs New India Assurance Co. Ltd. on 14 July, 2023

There is no reason to consider the version of the Respondent Insurance Company to rely on the judgement of the Hon'ble National Commission in P. Khamar Pasha Vs Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. in Revision Petition No. 724. In the present case the reputation on the ground of delay in intimating the claim is unacceptable. The complainant in its complaint had stated clearly that he had intimated about the theft of the vehicle immediately to the police and in this regard the police had filed its final report in the and the Court of ACJM had accepted the report on 12.04.2014 Therefore, there is no question of doubting the theft of the vehicle.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance ... vs Chaya Sharadchandra Raje Etc. on 9 October, 2019

On behalf of the respondent, ruling - 1.Mr.Mohd.Idris Mehabub Shaikh & ors. vs. M/s.New India Assurance Co.Ltd., in the consumer complaint no.CC/16/736 which is decided by this State Commission on 16/08/2019 is relied upon. "We had in that case considered 'A' summary report which would mean that though police had been informed of the incident of theft they could not bring culprit to book. In such cases, the incident was genuine and the registered motor vehicle was covered to the extent of Rs.7 lakhs as Insured Declared Value and, therefore, observations made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India are attracted on the ground that genuine claims cannot be thrown aside merely on the ground of delay to inform the incident to the insurer, particularly, when incident was already informed to police and they investigated into the theft."
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Raheja Qbe General Insurance Limited vs Sameeksh Gaonkar on 17 September, 2024

He further placed reliance on P. Khamar Pasha Vs Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited wherein the Hon'ble N.C held that the Appellant (i.e Insurance Company) cannot be saddled with the liability to pay compensation to the Respondent despite the fact that he had no complied with terms of the policy. The Respondent was duty bound to inform about the theft of the vehicle immediately after the incident on account of delayed intimation, the Appellant was deprived of its legitimate right to get an inquiry conducted into the alleged theft of vehicle and make an endeavour to recover the same.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1