Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.21 seconds)

Harsh Dabas & Anr. vs The State & Anr. on 6 March, 2012

7. The question that now comes up for consideration is whether such quashing of FIR would serve the ends of justice or not. Crime is not an offence only against an individual, but against the society as a whole. This is the reasoning behind crimes being prosecuted by State and the prosecutor files the case in the court as the State's representative as opposed the victim of the crime. The compounding of serious offences like murder and an attempt to murder cannot be routinely allowed as a consequence of settlement between the complainant and the victim, but only after weighing the facts and circumstances of each case. This Court in Crl.M.C. No.247/2012 titled Najibur Rehman @ Mujibur Rehman & Crl.M.C. No.3134/2011 Page 3 of 5 Anr. Vs. State & Ors. has already cautioned against quashing of FIR in cases of compromises in a mechanical manner.
Delhi High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 1 - M L Mehta - Full Document

Ajaypal & Ors. vs Mohit Nagar & Ors. on 12 March, 2012

8. This Court in Crl.M.C. No.247/2012 titled Najibur Rahman @ Mujibur Rehman & Anr. Vs. State & Ors. and Crl.M.C. No.3134/2011 titled Harsh Dabas & Anr. Vs. The State & Anr. has laid down specifically that compounding of serious offences will not be allowed only on the basis of settlement between the parties, but after having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case.
Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - M L Mehta - Full Document
1