Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 64 (0.73 seconds)
Documents citing Chajju vs Union Of India on 21 May, 1999

Chand Ram - Son vs Union Of India Through on 6 September, 2012

14. In the present case one of the petitioner has appeared as PW1 and has filed his affidavit claiming therein that the land acquired was cultivating land giving atleast 3­4 crops in a year and was earning Rs.50,000/­ per annum per bigha and market value of the land cannot be Rs.10 lakhs per bigha if the petitioners are supposed to cultivate for atleast another 20 years. It is also claimed that there were standing crops worth Rs.5 lacs on the date of acquisition and the petitioner not only suffered for standing crops but also LAC No. 236A/08 Page 6 of 17 Rs.3 lacs for the loss of agricultural equipment in the form of tractor etc. It is also claimed that in Ghoga Dairy project MCD has allotted land @ Rs.2500/­ per sq. yards where as DSIDC in the Bawana Industrial area, which is nearby to village Ghoga, has allotted the land @ Rs.4200/­ per sq. yards. Even a plot @ Rs.2500/­ per sq. yard was allotted to the son of petitioner by MCD in Ghoga and therefore, the land of the petitioner should be assessed at the same rate. He has relied upon the master plan of Delhi exhibited in another case Chajju Ram Vs. UOI to show that proximity of village Ghoga is adjacent to village Bawana and Narela.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajpal vs Union Of India Through on 14 October, 2011

Petitioner's counsel has further argued that the fact that the so called survey report is a fabricated document, is also supported by the fact that Patwari Sh. Bijender Singh has never been posted in the field ; that he suffers from physical handicap in his leg and could not have surveyed the acquired land. Petitioner's counsel placed on record and confronted the LAC/PW­2 with the certified copy of statement of said Patwari Sh. Bijender Singh recorded on 16.08.2004, in another case bearing LAC no. 35/2001, titled as Chajju Ram Vs. Union of India, wherein Sh. Bijender Singh stated before the Ld. Predecessor Court that :­ "....... I had never been patwari in any area i.e. actual Field. My First Posting was in LA Palam, South Branch in the year 1988. I have never been posted in the field, but was always posted in LA LAC No. 81A/08 Page 19 of 28 Branch only...."
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Jai Singh vs Union Of India on 7 September, 2007

Petitioner's counsel has further argued that the fact that the so called survey report is a fabricated document, is also supported by the fact that Patwari Sh. Bijender Singh has never been posted in the field ; that he suffers from physical handicap in his leg and could not have surveyed the acquired land. Petitioner's counsel placed on record and confronted the LAC/PW-2 with the certified copy of statement of said Patwari Sh. Bijender Singh recorded on 16.08.2004, in another case bearing LAC no. 35/2001, titled as Chajju Ram Vs. Union of India, wherein Sh. Bijender Singh stated before the Ld. Predecessor Court that :-
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

All R/O V. & P.O. Pooth Khurd vs Union Of India on 1 October, 2007

Petitioner's counsel has further argued that the fact that the so called survey report is a fabricated document, is also supported by the fact that Patwari Sh. Bijender Singh has never been posted in the field ; that he suffers from physical handicap in his leg and could not have surveyed the acquired land. Petitioner's counsel placed on record and confronted the LAC with the certified Page 20 of 54 copy of statement of said Patwari Sh. Bijender Singh recorded on 16.08.2004, in another case bearing LAC no. 35/2001, titled as Chajju Ram Vs. Union of India, wherein Sh. Bijender Singh stated before the Ld. Predecessor Court that :-
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

All R/O V. & P.O. Pooth Khurd vs Union Of India on 3 October, 2007

Petitioner's counsel has further argued that the fact that the so called survey report is a fabricated document, is also supported by the fact that Patwari Sh. Bijender Singh has never been posted in the field ; that he suffers from physical handicap in Page 20 of 54 his leg and could not have surveyed the acquired land. Petitioner's counsel placed on record and confronted the LAC with the certified copy of statement of said Patwari Sh. Bijender Singh recorded on 16.08.2004, in another case bearing LAC no. 35/2001, titled as Chajju Ram Vs. Union of India, wherein Sh. Bijender Singh stated before the Ld. Predecessor Court that :-
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Jagroop Singh vs Union Of India on 11 October, 2007

Petitioner's counsel has further argued that the fact that the so called survey report is a fabricated document, is also Page 24 of 58 supported by the fact that Patwari Sh. Bijender Singh has never been posted in the field ; that he suffers from physical handicap in his leg and could not have surveyed the acquired land. Petitioner's counsel placed on record and confronted the LAC with the certified copy of statement of said Patwari Sh. Bijender Singh recorded on 16.08.2004, in another case bearing LAC no. 35/2001, titled as Chajju Ram Vs. Union of India, wherein Sh. Bijender Singh stated before the Ld. Predecessor Court that :-
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Joginder vs Union Of India on 8 October, 2007

Petitioner's counsel has further argued that the fact that the so called survey report is a fabricated document, is also supported by the fact that Patwari Sh. Bijender Singh has never been posted in the field ; that he suffers from physical handicap in his leg and could not have surveyed the acquired land. Petitioner's counsel placed on record and confronted the LAC with the certified copy of statement of said Patwari Sh. Bijender Singh recorded on 16.08.2004, in another case bearing LAC no. 35/2001, titled as Chajju Ram Vs. Union of India, wherein Sh. Bijender Singh stated before the Ld. Predecessor Court that :-
Delhi District Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next