Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 66 (1.44 seconds)
Documents citing Philip Jeyasingh vs The Joint Registrar Of Co-Operative ... on 22 January, 1992

Phillip Jeyasingh vs The Joint Registrar Of Co-Operative ... on 22 November, 1993

Learned Counsel submits that the view expressed in Tamilarasan 's case (1991) 2 L.W. 409 (F.B.), could not have been considered by the Full Bench which decided this case earlier by the judgment dated 22nd January, 1992 Philip Jeyasingh v. The Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies (1992) 1 L.W. 216. The circumstances under which that Full Bench was constituted have been set out in detail in the judgment of the Full Bench. There is no need to refer to the same in this judgment.
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K. Ganesan vs The Special Officer, Salem ... on 22 November, 1993

The matter was referred to a Full Bench and it was decided in W. Philip Jeyasingh v. The Joint Registrar Co-operative Societies (1992) 1 M.LJ. 130 : (1992) 1 L.W. 216, that the view expressed by the Division Bench was wrong. Even thereafter, the learned Single Judge has expressed the opinion that neither of the Full Bench Judgments is binding on him and just like him all other Judges of this Court are not bound by the said judgment. That observation made by the learned Judge in the last sentence of his order is, to say the least, wholly unwarranted. It has been repeatedly pointed out in several cases by the Supreme Court that a judgment of a Division Bench or a Full Bench is binding on a single Judge of the Court and it cannot be ignored.
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

The Registrar, University Of Madras And ... vs Union Of India (Uoi), Represented By Its ... on 19 December, 1994

A Full Bench of this Court, to which one of us is a party, has discussed in detail in Philip Jeyasingh v. The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies (1992)2 M.L.J. 309, the meaning and scope of per incuriam and also pointed out that an authority subordinate to another authority cannot refuse to follow or ignore the decision of a higher authority on the ground that some relevant provision was not considered or some aspects of the matter in question were not discussed by the higher authority and that the decision of the higher authority was per incuriam.
Madras High Court Cites 89 - Cited by 13 - Full Document

The Registrar, University Of Madras, ... vs The Union Of India, Represented By Its ... on 19 December, 1994

A Full Bench of this Court, to which one of us is a party, has discussed in detail in Philip Jeyasingh v. The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies ((1992) II MLJ. 309) the meaning and scope of per incuriam and also pointed out that an authority subordinate to another authority cannot refuse to follow or ignore the decision of a higher authority on the ground that some relevant provision was not considered or some aspects of the matter in question were not discussed by the higher authority and that the decision of the higher authority was per incuriam.
Madras High Court Cites 83 - Cited by 13 - M Srinivasan - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next