Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 271 (2.32 seconds)

Deepak Dubey vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 29 April, 2024

In Hari Narain v. Badri Das [AIR 1963 SC 1558] this Court adverted to the aforesaid rule and revoked the leave granted to the appellant by making the following observations: (AIR p. 1558) "It is of utmost importance that in making material statements and setting forth grounds in applications for special leave 11 W.P.No.9885/2024 made under Article 136 of the Constitution, care must be taken not to make any statements which are inaccurate, untrue or misleading. In dealing with applications for special leave, the Court naturally takes statements of fact and grounds of fact contained in the petitions at their face value and it would be unfair to betray the confidence of the Court by making statements which are untrue and misleading. Thus, if at the hearing of the appeal the Supreme Court is satisfied that the material statements made by the appellant in his application for special leave are inaccurate and misleading, and the respondent is entitled to contend that the appellant may have obtained special leave from the Supreme Court on the strength of what he characterises as misrepresentations of facts contained in the petition for special leave, the Supreme Court may come to the conclusion that in such a case special leave granted to the appellant ought to be revoked."
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 62 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Mohan Yaduwanshi (Dead) Thr. Lrs. Smt. ... vs The Chief Managing Director on 30 September, 2024

In Hari Narain v. Badri Das [AIR 1963 SC 1558] stress was laid on litigants eschewing inaccurate, untrue or misleading statements, otherwise leave granted to an appellant may be revoked. It was observed as follows: (AIR p. 1560, para 9) NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2024:MPHC-JBP:50018 2024:MPHC 16 W.P. No.10853/2006 "9. ... It is of utmost importance that in making material statements and setting forth grounds in applications for special leave care must be taken not to make any statements which are inaccurate, untrue or misleading. In dealing with applications for special leave, the Court naturally takes statements of fact and grounds of fact contained conta in the petitions at their face value and it would be unfair to betray the confidence of the Court by making statements which are untrue and misleading. That is why we have come to the conclusion that in the present case, special leave granted to the appellant a ought to be revoked. Accordingly, special leave is revoked and the appeal is dismissed. The appellant will pay the costs of the respondent."
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next