In Hari Narain v. Badri Das [AIR 1963 SC 1558]
this Court adverted to the aforesaid rule and revoked
the leave granted to the appellant by making the
following observations: (AIR p. 1558)
"It is of utmost importance that in
making material statements and setting forth
grounds in applications for special leave
11 W.P.No.9885/2024
made under Article 136 of the Constitution,
care must be taken not to make any
statements which are inaccurate, untrue or
misleading. In dealing with applications for
special leave, the Court naturally takes
statements of fact and grounds of fact
contained in the petitions at their face value
and it would be unfair to betray the
confidence of the Court by making
statements which are untrue and misleading.
Thus, if at the hearing of the appeal the
Supreme Court is satisfied that the material
statements made by the appellant in his
application for special leave are inaccurate
and misleading, and the respondent is
entitled to contend that the appellant may
have obtained special leave from the
Supreme Court on the strength of what he
characterises as misrepresentations of facts
contained in the petition for special leave,
the Supreme Court may come to the
conclusion that in such a case special leave
granted to the appellant ought to be
revoked."
In Hari Narain v. Badri Das, AIR 1963 SC 1558 stress was laid on litigants eschewing inaccurate, untrue or misleading statements, otherwise leave granted to an appellant may be revoked. It was observed as follows:
In Hari Narain v. Badri Das [AIR 1963
SC 1558] stress was laid on litigants eschewing
inaccurate, untrue or misleading statements,
otherwise leave granted to an appellant may be
revoked. It was observed as follows: (AIR p.
1560, para 9)
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2024:MPHC-JBP:50018
2024:MPHC
16 W.P. No.10853/2006
"9. ... It is of utmost importance that
in making material statements and
setting forth grounds in applications
for special leave care must be taken
not to make any statements which
are inaccurate, untrue or misleading.
In dealing with applications for
special leave, the Court naturally
takes statements of fact and grounds
of fact contained
conta in the petitions at
their face value and it would be
unfair to betray the confidence of the
Court by making statements which
are untrue and misleading. That is
why we have come to the conclusion
that in the present case, special leave
granted to the appellant
a ought to be
revoked. Accordingly, special leave
is revoked and the appeal is
dismissed. The appellant will pay the
costs of the respondent."
In Hari Narain
v. Badri Das [AIR 1963 SC 1558] stress was laid on litigants
eschewing inaccurate, untrue or misleading statements, otherwise
leave granted to an appellant may be revoked. It was observed as
follows: (AIR p. 1560, para 9)
In Hari Narain v.
Badri Das [AIR 1963 SC 1558] stress was laid on litigants eschewing
inaccurate, untrue or misleading statements, otherwise leave granted to
an appellant may be revoked. It was observed as follows: (AIR p.
1560, para 9)"
In
Hari Narain v. Badri Das [AIR 1963 SC 1558] stress
was laid on litigants eschewing inaccurate, untrue or
misleading statements, otherwise leave granted to an
appellant may be revoked. It was observed as follows: