Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.27 seconds)

Sunder Singh And Ors. vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 21 September, 1983

24. As already noticed in the opening part of the judgment different Returning Officers read the rules differently and to avoid different interpretation to be given by different prescribed authorities before whom the election petitions had. to be filed. we entertain these writ petitions. In view of the interpretation of various rules given by us in regard to questions Nos. 1 and 2 and the procedure to be followed during election, C. W. P. No; 3284 of 1983 is allowed and the election result declared by the Returning Officer is quashed and direction is issued to hold election amongst the 15 candidates, who are left in the field for the offices of Panches. in accordance with law keeping in view the law laid down in this judgment.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

Mohan S/O. Marotrao Patil-Taklikar vs The State Of Maharashtra Through on 15 October, 2013

Shri Veer, in addition, also invited our attention to the judgment of the Pubjab and Haryana High Court in the matter of "Umrao Singh and others Vs. Meher Chand and others" reported in AIR 1982 P & H 91, for ::: Downloaded on - 27/11/2013 20:27:03 ::: {12} revised 4001.12.odt very same purpose. Advocate Shri Sangle, for the Chief Executive Officer, has also prayed for dismissal of the petition.

Tara Chand vs Piara Lal And Ors. on 22 November, 1989

7. The ratio of the decision of the Apex Court in K. K. Shrivastava's case (supra) as well as of the Division Bench of the Court in Umrao Singh's case (supra) is of no help to the petitioner in this case as therein the controversy related to the maintainability of the writ petition under Article 26 of the Constitution in the face of the availability of an alternative efficacious remedy.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1