Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.44 seconds)
Documents citing V. Karuna vs The State Of Telangana on 19 March, 2019

M/S Clean City Estates Pvt. Ltd., And Ano vs Prl. Secy., M.W. Dept. And 2 Ors on 5 May, 2026

25. Learned Standing Counsel for the Wakf Board, appearing for respondent No.2, pleaded that the survey was conducted much earlier by following due procedure and the alleged vendors of Mr.P. Babu Seth did not assail the same and therefore, the successors-in-interest of Mr.P.Babu Seth, i.e., the petitioners herein, cannot challenge the same at this stage after a long delay of nearly 30 years. He placed reliance upon the TMD,J WP_6898_2015 21 decision of this Court in the case of V. Aruna v. State of Telangana 2 in W.P.No.7570 of 2019 and batch dated 10.03.2020 and prayed for dismissal of the Writ Petition.
Telangana High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dharavath Srinivas vs The State Of Telangana on 25 January, 2024

6. Admittedly and as rightly pointed out by the learned Standing Counsel, this Court in V. Aruna's case, upheld the gazette publication dated 09.02.1989 and held that registration of notified waqf properties cannot be granted. In view of the same, unless and until the subject property is de-notified, it cannot be permitted to be taken up for registration. Though, learned counsel for petitioner submits that, in similar circumstances, this Court directed the respondents to receive, register and release the document presented by the petitioner, however, subject to condition that such registration shall be treated as provisional and subject to result of the Writ Petition, this Court, in view of the judgments relied on by the learned Standing Counsel, has no hesitation to hold that waqf properties are inalienable and when once the land is notified as waqf and information is furnished to the registering authority, the registering authority is restrained from entertaining deeds of conveyance.
Telangana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - N Bheemapaka - Full Document
1