Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 54 (1.00 seconds)
Documents citing Raja Srivalgoti Sarvagna Kumara ... vs Special Land Acquisition Officer, City ... on 16 January, 1979

Ram Phal (Since Deceased) vs Union Of India on 16 May, 2019

25. It transpires that in the Award Ex.PW1/1 the judgment passed by the Hon'be Supreme Court in Krishna Yachendra Bahadurvar vs. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, City Improvement Trust Board, Bangalore & Ors AIR 1979 SC 869 had been relied upon wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court had held that the process of determination of market value in any case must depend largely on evaluation of any imponderables and hence, it must necessarily be to some extent a matter of conjecture or guess work. Learned Predecessor, therefore, fixed the market value of the land in question @ Rs.59,770/­, on the basis of market value assessed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi of Land of Village Ladha Sarai as on 04.05.1975 @ Ramphal vs. UOI & Anr. Page 10 of 13 LAC No.157/2016 Rs.32,750/­ per bigha and by enhancing the same with simple interest of 15% for 5­1/2 years i.e. from May, 1975 to November, 1980.
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Chet Ram Sharma (Deceased) vs Union Of India on 26 February, 2022

Support is also drawn from the observations of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Krishna Yachendra Bahadurvaru V. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, City Improvement Trust Board, Bangalore & Ors. reported in AIR 1979 SC 869 wherein the Apex Court held that the process of determination of market value in any case must depend largely on evaluation of any imponderables and hence it must necessarily be to some extent a matter of conjecture or guess work. Applying deduction of 20% towards development cost as assessed in the preceding paragraphs, upon Rs. 9240/- per sq. mtr, the figure comes out to be Rs. 7392/- per sq. mtr. (Rs. 8840.758 per sq. yd) as on the date of issuance of notification under Section 4 of LA Act. The market value of acquired land of 2 bighas and 16 biswas comprised in Khasra no. 621/2/3/2/2/1 is assessed at Rs. 7392/- per sq. mtr. (Rs. 8840.758 per sq. yds.)
Delhi District Court Cites 96 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. S. S. Aggarwal vs Union Of India on 24 May, 2023

In the matter of Krishna Yachendra Bahadurvaru v. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, City improvement Trust Board, Bangalore & Ors, reported in AIR 1979 SC 869, Hon'ble Apex Court had held that the process of determination of market value in any case must depend largely on evaluation of any imponderables and hence it must necessarily be to some extent a matter of conjecture or guess work.
Delhi District Court Cites 69 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Om Parkash vs Union Of India on 24 May, 2023

In the matter of Krishna Yachendra Bahadurvaru v. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, City improvement Trust Board, Bangalore & Ors, reported in AIR 1979 SC 869, Hon'ble Apex Court had held that the process of determination of market value in any case must depend largely on evaluation of any imponderables and hence it must necessarily be to some extent a matter of conjecture or guess work.
Delhi District Court Cites 67 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Raja Bhairabendra Narayan Bhup vs Collector Of Goalpara At Dhubri on 18 February, 1986

However, these are not exhaustive but illustrative cases. The Court is required to arrive as near as possible at estimate of real market value. The Court may choose one method or even two or all the methods to determine the true and correct valuation of the land. The market value is to be estimated not merely by existing use of the land but by the best use to which a willing purchaser would put it. These principles are culled from (1) South Eastern Railway Company v. London County Council, (1915) 2 Ch 252; (2) Special Land Acquisition Officer v. T. Adinarayan Setty, AIR 1959 SC 429 (430); (3) Raghubans Narain Singh v. U. P. Government, (1967) 1 SCR 489 : AIR 1967 SC 465 (467); (4) State of Gujarat v. Vakhatsinghji Vajesinghji Vaghela, AIR 1968 SC 1481; (5) Radhakishan Laxminarayan v. Collector of Akola, (1968) 1 SCWR 692 : 1968 SCD 647; (6) Sri Rani M. Vijayalakshamamma Rao Bahadur v. Collector of Madras, (1968) 2 SCJ 869; (7) Tribeni Devi v. Collector of Ranchi, AIR 1972 SC 1417 : (1972) 3 SCR 208; (8) Union of India v. Ram Mehar, AIR 1973 SC 305 : (1973) 2 SCR 720; (9) Dollar Company v. Collector of Madras, AIR 1975 SC 1670; (10) State of West Bengal v. Shyamapada, AIR 1975 SC 1723; (II) Thakur Kanta Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar, AIR 1976 SC 2219; (12) Land Acquisition Officer, City Improvement Trust Board v. H. Narayanaiah, AIR 1976 SC 2403; (13) Prithvi Raj Taneja v. State of M.P., (1977) 1 SCC 684 : (AIR 1977 SC 1560); (14) Collector of Raigarh v. Dr. Harisingh Thakur, (1979) 1 SCC 236 : (AIR 1979 SC 472); (15) Raja Srivalgoti Sarvagna Kumar Krishna Yachandra Bachadurvaru v. Special Land Acquisition Officer, (1979) 4 SCC 356 : (AIR 1979 SC 869).
Gauhati High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 4 - K N Saikia - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next