Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.56 seconds)
Documents citing State Of U.P. And 2 Others vs Raj Surya Pratap Singh Chauhan on 8 May, 2015

Yatendra Kumar vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others on 2 February, 2021

Facts in the case of Vaibhav Singh (supra) and Raj Surya Pratap Singh Chauhan (supra) are clearly distinct from the facts of the present case. In the case of Raj Surya Pratap Singh Chauhan, the State Government had issued a Government Order, dated 23rd September, 2011, as per which, the eligibility had to be examined on the date of first application moved for grant of compassionate appointment. On the date of first application, Raj Surya Pratap Singh Chauhan was eligible for appointment to the post of Sub-Inspector (Ministerial), but he failed to qualify in the recruitment held for the post. His claim for appointment to the post of Constable was accepted, but he refused to join. His subsequent application for appointment to the post of Sub-Inspector (Civil Police) was declined on the ground that he did not possess requisite qualification on the date of his first application and had also failed to avail of the compassionate appointment offered for the post of Constable.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A K Mishra - Full Document

Raj Pratap Singh vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And ... on 18 November, 2025

9. Accordingly, application is allowed and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.9012 of 2023, State Vs. Raj Pratap Singh, arising out of Case Crime No.160 of 2019, under Section 507 IPC, Police Station Bhiti, District Ambedkar Nagar, pending in the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division)/FTC/Judicial Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar, are hereby quashed so far it relates to the applicant(s).
Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Raj Pratap Singh vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home ... on 29 August, 2025

The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 of the B.N.S.S.,2023 has been filed with the prayer to quash/set aside the impugned summoning order dated 21/01/2023 passed by learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Fast track Court/Judicial Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar and chargesheet no.01/2019 dated 06/05/2021 arising out of criminal case No. 9012/2023 (State Vs. Raj Pratap Singh) relating to bearing Case Crime No. 160/2019, Under section 507, I.P.C. registered at Police Station - Bhiti, District - Ambedkar Nagar on the basis of compromise dated 11.08.2025, and the entire criminal proceeding Case No. 9012/2023 (State Vs. Raj Pratap Singh) bearing Case Crime No. 160/2019, Under section 507 I.P.C. registered at Police Station - Bhiti, District - Ambedkar Nagar on the basis of compromise dated 11.08.2025.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Surya Pratap vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of ... on 30 September, 2022

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant for quashing the charge sheet dated 22.03.2022 arising out of case crime no.283/2021, under Sections 354, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 7/8 POCSO Act, Police Station Munshiganj, District Amethi as well as summoning/cognizance order dated 30.08.2022 passed by learned Special Judge, POCSO Act, Court No.12, Sultanpur in Special Sessions Case No.944/2022, State vs. Surya Pratap.
Allahabad High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rayal Yadav And 2 Otehrs vs State Of U.P. And Another on 28 January, 2020

The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A(1) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been preferred against the impugned summoning order dated 10.10.2019 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Azamgarh, in Session Trial No. 213 of 2019(State of U.P. Vs. Raj Deo Chauhan @ Majnu Chauhan), arising out of Case Crime No.196 of 2018, whereby the appellants were summoned under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, IPC and Section 3(1)(Da), 3(1)(Dha) and Section 3(2)(5)(Ka) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Gambhirpur, District Azamgarh.
Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - R Joshi - Full Document

Gaurav Pratap Singh vs State Of U.P. on 18 June, 2020

In backdrop of above legal position, after considering the rival submissions and record, without commenting on the merit of the case, let the Appellant, Gaurav Pratap Singh, be released on bail in Session Trial No. 1186 of 2011 (State of U.P. vs. Gaurav Pratap Singh), Case Crime No. 304 of 2010, under Sections 307/34, 323/34 IPC, Police Station Chakeri, District Kanpur Nagar, during pending appeal on following conditions:-
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S S Shamshery - Full Document

Prabal Pratap Singh vs State Of U.P. And Another on 25 August, 2021

The present application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking to quash the entire proceedings in pursuance of charge sheet dated 25.10.2015 as well as impugned summoning order dated 07.05.2016 in Case No. 1226 of 2016 arising out of Case Crime No. 224 of 2015 (State of U.P. Vs. Prabal Pratap Singh) under section 135 Electricity Act, Police Station Kagaraul, District Agra.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Y K Srivastava - Full Document

Surya Pratap Singh Alias Golu Dhimar vs State Of U.P. And Another on 6 March, 2024

This criminal appeal has been preferred under Section 14-A (1) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 'SC/ST Act') for setting aside the cognizance/summoning order dated 09.02.2024 passed by the Court of Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Jalaun at Orai in S.T. No. 23 of 2024 (State of U.P. Vs. Surya Pratap Singh Golu Dhimar), arising out of Case Crime No.0893 of 2023, under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) SC/ST Act, P.S. Kotwali Orai, District Jalaun.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next