Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.73 seconds)
Documents citing Ram Murat (Dead) By Lrs. And Anr. vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation And ... on 14 March, 2000

The Management Of vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Labour on 12 June, 2009

15. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Rahimal (Dead) by LRs and another versus Deputy Director of Consolidation and others reported in (2002) 10 SCC 94 has held that the finding recorded and affirmed by the High Court is the finding of fact and it cannot be assailed in the appeal. Similarly, in this case, the findings given by the appellate authority and confirmed by the learned Single Judge of this court, is a finding of fact and cannot be interfered with by this court in Appeal.
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - N Kirubakaran - Full Document

The Management Of Aringnar Anna vs The Workmen Employed In Arignar Anna on 26 October, 2009

the jurisdiction of this Court is very limited as pronounced by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rahimal (Dead) by LRs and another Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation and others reported in (2002) 10 SCC 94 wherein it has been held that the finding recorded by the Court is the finding of fact and it cannot be assailed in the appeal, and finding of fact cannot be interfered with by this Court.
Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - N Kirubakaran - Full Document

Prem Nath And Ors. vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation ... on 18 June, 2015

In the case at hand there has been no adjudication by the SOC either of the appeal in entirety or of any matter/issue. Even after amendment in the year 2002 and addition of explanation 3 to Section 48 the revisional authority is not empowered to adopt the course of action as done by him in this case. Explanation 3 only empowers him to enter into the question of fact to examine any finding recorded by the subordinate authority whether on fact or law and in this context it includes the power to re-appreciate the evidence for the purpose of examination of correctness, legality or propriety of any such finding. It does not mean that the revisional authority can call for the records of the appellate authority and decide the appeal himself in exercise of his revisional powers without any finding having been recorded by the appellate authority or appeal itself having been decided. Reference may be made in this regard to the pronouncement made by this Court in the case of Karan Singh (Dead) Through L. Rs. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Aligarh and others, reported in [2003(94) RD 382 wherein after noticing the decision of the apex court in Gaya Deen (D) through L.Rs and others Vs. Hanuman Prasad (D) through L. Rs and others reported in [2001 (92) RD 79 (SC) as also the amendment of 2002 the Court held in para 6 as under:--
Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 3 - R Roy - Full Document
1   2 Next