citedby: 4211116

Dlf Homes Rajapura Pvt. Ltd vs Late O.P. Mehta & Anr. on 11 July, 2022

24. Responding to the submissions of Ms. Agnihotri, Mr. Bhattacharya, at the very outset, submits, relying on Mohd. Shafeeq v. Mirza Mohd. Hussain14 that an order condoning delay is, by its very nature, discretionary, and is impervious to interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

Delhi High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - C H Shankar - Full Document

Paramjeet Singh vs M/S. Loyola Educational Society And 2 ... on 1 April, 2022

iv) Mohammad Shafeeq v. Mirza Mohammad Husain and others12.

Telangana High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Paramjeet Singh vs M/S. Loyola Educational Society on 1 April, 2022

iv) Mohammad Shafeeq v. Mirza Mohammad Husain and others12.

Telangana High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ram Keval vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation, ... on 10 January, 2024

Interfering with an order of condoning the delay, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Mohammad Shafeeq v. Mirza Mohammad Husain; (2002) 9 SCC 460; observed as under:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Dal Singar Singh And Others vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation, ... on 16 February, 2024

Interfering with an order of condoning the delay, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Mohammad Shafeeq v. Mirza Mohammad Husain; (2002) 9 SCC 460; observed as under:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Dlf Homes Rajapura Pvt. Ltd vs Late O.P. Mehta & Anr on 6 July, 2022

6. Mr. Chandrachur Bhattacharya, learned Counsel for the respondents initially submitted, relying on Mohd. Shafiq v. Mirza Mohd. Hussain 5 that the order of the learned NCDRC, condoning delay, being discretionary in nature, warranted no interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India would be justified.

Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - C H Shankar - Full Document

Madan Lal Suryawanshi vs Tara Devi (Now Deceases Through Its Lrs on 12 July, 2022

25. On the advisability of an Article 227 Court interfering with an order condoning delay, the Supreme Court has this to say in Mohammad Shafeeq v. Mirza Mohammad Husain1:

Delhi High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - C H Shankar - Full Document

N.I.A.Co.Ltd vs Kalyan Singh & Ors on 9 April, 2013

In view of the decisions of Hon'ble Supreme Court in 7 Mohammad Shafeeq vs. Mirza Mohammad Husain & Ors., reported in (2002) 9 SCC 460; National Insurance Co.Ltd.

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - V Bishnoi - Full Document

Ram Ajor And 7 Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue ... on 21 March, 2024

On being confronted on the issue settled regarding causing interference by the higher Courts in the discretionary orders of the trial court in judgments of Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Wander v. Antox India Pvt. Ltd.; 1990 Supp SCC 727 and in Mohammad Shafeeq v. Mirza Mohammad Husain; (2002) 9 SCC 460, learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing at some length, prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to pursue the suit in issue before court concerned.

Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results