Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.24 seconds)

Sri Nagaraj K C vs The Life Insurance Corporation Of India on 3 July, 2024

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner is more than justified in heavily banking upon a Coordinate Bench judgment in SUTRAM SURESH supra. However his contention that in terms of the very same judgment the accumulated commission be permitted to be taken by his client pending enquiry, is bit difficult to countenance. Rule 19(2) of the 2017 Regulations provide for forfeiture of accumulated commission. Since the -7- NC: 2024:KHC:25164 WP No. 27093 of 2023 matter is being remanded for fresh enquiry, Petitioner is not justified in making such a prayer.
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - S R Kumar - Full Document

K P Narasimha Murthy vs The Life Insurance Corporation Of India on 19 July, 2023

5. The reliance of the counsel for petitioner on a Coordinate Bench decision in W.P.No.29459/2019 between SRI SUTRAM SURESH VS. SR. DIVISIONAL MANAGER AND OTHERS, disposed off on 2.3.2023 does not much come to his aid inasmuch as the same has been structured on the violation of principles of natural justice. Whether the forfeiture as a penalty could have been levied or not has not been discussed in the fact matrix matchable to the case of petitioner herein. It hardly needs to be stated that the scope of appeal shall include the challenge to the penalty order that immediately blacklisted the petitioner.
Karnataka High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - K S Dixit - Full Document
1