Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.34 seconds)
Documents citing Parbhani Transport Co-Operative ... vs G.V. Bedekar And Ors. on 24 August, 1959

P.Mari vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 4 February, 2011

38.He also referred to a judgment of a division bench judgment of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 20 Bombay High Court in Parbhani Transport Cooperative Society Ltd. Vs. G.V.Bedekar, Commissioner and others reported in AIR 1960 Bombay 278, wherein the Bombay High Court held that Sections 47 and 68-C of the M.V. Act apply to different circumstances and not to identical situation. Under 68-C, it contemplates preparation of scheme by the Corporation and it is only when such a scheme is decided, then the provision of the section will apply. When the Corporation does not prepare the scheme, then Section 68-C cannot be availed.
Madras High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - K Chandru - Full Document

Bihar State Road Transport Corporation vs State Transport Appellate Tribunal And ... on 26 July, 1974

14. The question as to whether a Corporation can apply, along with other private operators, for a permit in accordance with Chapter IV of the Motor Vehicles Act for a route which had not been nationalised in accordance with Chapter IV-A had been the subject-matter of controversy. But since it has been decided that Chapter IV-A, which is a special provision for nationalised routes over which the Corporation has a monopoly, does not debar the Corporation from applying for any route which has not been nationalised according to the provisions of Chapter IV. In this connection reliance may be placed on the cases of Raja Khangarjee v. State of Bihar (AIR 1960 Pat 506) and Parbhani Transport Co-operative Society Ltd. v. G. V. Bedekar (AIR T960 Bom 278), where it was held that there was nothing in the language of any of the provisions of the new Chapter IV-A of the amended Act to suggest that the right of a transport undertaking to make an application for State carriage permit under Section 37 (2) of the Motor Vehicles Act has been taken away expressly or by necessary implication. Section 63 which is within Chapter IV, is a specific provision for granting a permit for a route which is within the jurisdiction of different transport authorities within the State as well for a route which is partly in another State. Sub-section (1) of Section 63 reads as follows:--
Patna High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 1 - N P Singh - Full Document

P.Mari vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 4 February, 2011

38.He also referred to a judgment of a division bench judgment of the Bombay High Court in Parbhani Transport Cooperative Society Ltd. Vs. G.V.Bedekar, Commissioner and others reported in AIR 1960 Bombay 278, wherein the Bombay High Court held that Sections 47 and 68-C of the M.V. Act apply to different circumstances and not to identical situation. Under 68-C, it contemplates preparation of scheme by the Corporation and it is only when such a scheme is decided, then the provision of the section will apply. When the Corporation does not prepare the scheme, then Section 68-C cannot be availed.
Madras High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - K Chandru - Full Document
1