Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 294 (1.46 seconds)
Documents citing Joseph Shine vs Union Of India on 27 September, 2018

Satyam Sudarshan vs The State Of Telangana on 3 August, 2022

11. Considering the above discussion and principle laid down in the above said authorities, the law laid down by the Apex 2 (1986) 2 SCC 709 3 2019 0 Supreme (P & H) 221 9 Court in Joseph Shine v. Union of India (supra) also applies to the case on hand. Therefore, the proceedings against the petitioner cannot be permitted to proceed against the petitioner for the offence under Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code.
Telangana High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - D Nagarjun - Full Document

Jane Kaushik vs Union Of India on 17 October, 2025

83. What is discernible from the expositions in Joseph (supra) and Nitisha (supra) is that indirect discrimination does not stem from active discrimination arising out of an intention to exclude, but rather from the lethargy or inertia to not change the unjust status quo and move towards more progressive practices. It is in this context that redressal of disadvantage and how it is done gains importance. It becomes abundantly clear that when the disadvantage stands recognised, its redressal should not be such that it exacerbates the very disadvantage sought to be addressed. There is no gainsaying that the approach to eradicate historical, social, political and economic disadvantages must be such that redressal mechanisms do not become perpetrators of discrimination by themselves.
Supreme Court of India Cites 137 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S. Tata Steel Ltd vs State Of Odisha And Others .... Opposite ... on 20 April, 2026

In support of his contention that in absence of any reasons behind the W.P.(C) No.31035 of 2025 & Batch Page 82 of 167 imposition of absolute no fault fiscal penalty on account of a shortfall in dispatch, he relies upon the judgments of the Supreme Court in Citizenship Act, 1955 Section 6- A, In Re reported in (2024) 16 SCC 105; Shayara Bano Vs. Union of India, reported in (2017) 9 SCC 1; Joseph Shine Vs. Union of India, reported in (2019) 3 SCC 39 and Cellular Operators Association of India Vs. TRAI, reported in (2016) 7 SCC 703.
Orissa High Court Cites 123 - Cited by 0 - M S Raman - Full Document

M/S. Tata Steel Ltd vs State Of Odisha And Others .... Opposite ... on 20 April, 2026

In support of his contention that in absence of any reasons behind the W.P.(C) No.31035 of 2025 & Batch Page 82 of 167 imposition of absolute no fault fiscal penalty on account of a shortfall in dispatch, he relies upon the judgments of the Supreme Court in Citizenship Act, 1955 Section 6- A, In Re reported in (2024) 16 SCC 105; Shayara Bano Vs. Union of India, reported in (2017) 9 SCC 1; Joseph Shine Vs. Union of India, reported in (2019) 3 SCC 39 and Cellular Operators Association of India Vs. TRAI, reported in (2016) 7 SCC 703.
Orissa High Court Cites 123 - Cited by 0 - M S Raman - Full Document

P.Satheesh Prabu vs The Tamilnadu Public Service ... on 22 December, 2023

93.] Similarly, this Court has recognised the fashion in which discrimination operates by dint of “structures of oppression and domination” which prevent certain groups from enjoying the full panoply of entitlements. [Young Lawyers Assn. (Sabarimala Temple-5J.) v. State of Kerala, (2019) 11 SCC 1, (Chandrachud, J., concurring opinion, para 420); Joseph Shine v. Union of India, (2019) 3 SCC 39 : (2019) 2 SCC (Cri) 84, (Chandrachud, J., concurring opinion, paras 113-114) (“Joseph Shine”)] The focus in anti- discrimination enquiry, has switched from looking at the intentions or motive of the discriminator to examining whether a rule, formally or substantively, “contributes to the subordination of a disadvantaged group of individuals” [Joseph Shine v. Union of India, (2019) 3 SCC 39 : (2019) 2 SCC (Cri) 84] .
Madras High Court Cites 59 - Cited by 0 - R Mahadevan - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next