Sh. Lalit Mohan vs Sh. Pramod Kumar on 9 March, 2021
Brief facts of the present petition as per the petitioner are that the tenanted
premises were let out to the father of the respondent, Sh Mohinder Kumar
Gupta by the previous owner. It is stated that the petitioner had purchased the
suit property vide Registered Sale Deed dated 3.12.04. It is stated that the
RC No. 46/21 Lalit Mohan Vs Pramod Kumar 1 /20
respondent has not been very regular with the payment of rent. It is stated that
the tenanted premises are bonafidely required by the petitoner for opening a
Yoga Centre for his mother. It is stated that father of the petitioner had passed
away in 2019 and mother of the petitioner, aged about 76 years, now want to
open a yoga centre for her livelihood for which she needs 400500 sq yards
approximately. That the total area of property no 6, Alipur Road is 900 sq
yards, out of which 450 sq yards is a residential bungalow and remaining 450
sq yards is commercial area containing 4 shops, out of which 2 are in the
possession of the petitioner and are lying closed for last several years. It is
stated that the tenanted premises is the most suitable for his bonafide need
being closest to the residence of his mother, who is residing at 8/8 Sri Ram
Road, Civil Lines, Delhi110054. That due to her old age , mother of the
petitioner cannot travel far. It is furthermore stated that mother of the petitioner
does not have any similar alternate accommodation. That mother of the
petitioner want to earn her livelihood along with the public services for a nobel
cause. That the respondent is running separate business and the tenanted shop
is lying locked. The petitioner has filed the site plan, photocopy of the sale
deed dated 3.12.2004 and photographs of the tenanted premises.