Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 127 (0.82 seconds)
Documents citing Sukhdev Singh, Oil & Natural Gas ... vs Bhagat Ram, Association Of Clause Ii. ... on 21 February, 1975

Y.L. Ahuja vs Institute Of Applied Manpower And ... on 18 September, 1995

Chief Justice, in Sukhdev Singh Vs. Bhagat Ram we would for reasons already discussed, prefer to adopt the test of governmental instrumentality or agency as .one more test and perhaps a more satisfactory one for determining whether a statutory corporation, body or other authority falls within the definition of "State". If a statutory corporation, body or other authority is an instrumentality or agency of government, it would be an 'authority' and, therefore, "State" within the meaning of that expression in Article 12".
Delhi High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 2 - J B Goel - Full Document

Ramana Dayaram Shetty vs The International Airport Authority Of ... on 4 May, 1979

Whilst accepting the test laid down in Rajasthan Electricity Board v. Mohan Lal (supra), and followed by Ray, C. J., in Sukhdev v. Bhagat Ram (supra), we would, for reasons already discussed, prefer to adopt the test of Governmental instrumentality or agency as one more test and perhaps a more satisfactory one for determining whether a statutory corporation, body or other authority falls within the definition of 'State'. If a statutory corporation, body or other authority is an instrumentality or agency of Government, it would be an 'authority' and therefore 'State' within the meaning of that expression in Article 12.
Supreme Court of India Cites 47 - Cited by 2519 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document

Junaid Amin Wani And Others vs State Of J&K; And Others on 16 July, 2018

This test was followed by Ray, C.J., in Sukhdev v. Bhagat Ram (supra). Mathew, J., in the same case, propounded a broader test, namely, whether the statutory corporation or the other body or the authority, claimed to fall within the definition of the State, is an instrumentality or agency of the Government: if it is, it would fall within the meaning of the expression 'other authorities' and would be the 'State'.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench Cites 96 - Cited by 0 - M K Hanjura - Full Document

Indian Institute Of Management vs Ukakant Shrivastva on 16 March, 2001

The Division Bench, in case of Dr. C.A. SHAH (Supra) after considering the decisions in the case of SUKHDEV SINGH v. BHAGAM RAM, AIR 1975 SC 1331, MALLOCH V. ABERDEEN CORPORATION - 1971 (2) AER 1278, MANMOHAN SINGH V. COMMR. U.T. CHANDIGARH - AIR 1985 SC 364, DIPAK KUMAR V. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION - AIR 1987 SC 1422 wherein the decision of VAISH COLLEGE VS. LAKSHMI NARAIN -1976 (2) SCR 1066 : AIR 1976 SC 888 was considered, held as under in paragraph 15:
Gujarat High Court Cites 73 - Cited by 3 - R R Tripathi - Full Document

Ispat Industries Ltd. & Anr. vs Union Of India & Ors. on 3 February, 2000

As early as 1819 the Supreme Court of the United States in Mac Cullough v. Maryland held that the Congress has power to charter corporations as incidental to or in ald of government functions and, as pointed out by Mathew, J., in Sukhdev v. Bhagat Ram (supra) such federal corporations would ex-hypothesis be agencies of the Government. In Great Britain too, the policy of public administration through separate Corporation was gradually evolved and the conduct of basis industries through giant corporations has now become a permanent feature of public life. So far as India is concerned, the genesis of the emergence of corporations as instrumentalities or agencies of Government is to be found in the Government of India Resolution on Industrial Policy dated April 6, 1948 where it was stated inter alia that "management of State enterprise will as rule be through the medium of public corporation under the statutory control of the Central Government who will assume such powers as may be necessary to ensure this". It was in pursuane of the policy envisaged in this and subsequent resolutions on industrial policy that corporation were created by Government for setting up and management of public enterprises and carrying out other public functions,"
Calcutta High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The vs Government Of A.P. Rep on 10 July, 2020

In Sukhdev Singh and others vs. Bhagat Ram and others2, the question fell for the decision of Hon'ble apex court was whether regulations framed under Oil and Natural Gas Commission Act, 1959; the Industrial Finance Corporation Act, 1948 and Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 have the force of law. In this context, the 2 MANU/SC/0667/1975 = (1975) 1 SCC 421 14 UDPR, J WP.No.4238 of 2020 Supreme Court observed that Rules, Regulations, Schemes, Bye-laws, orders are the facets of delegated legislation and they have the force of parent legislation. The observations are as follows:
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - U D Rao - Full Document

The vs Government Of A.P. Rep on 10 July, 2020

In Sukhdev Singh and others vs. Bhagat Ram and others2, the question fell for the decision of Hon'ble apex court was whether regulations framed under Oil and Natural Gas Commission Act, 1959; the Industrial Finance Corporation Act, 1948 and Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 have the force of law. In this context, the 2 MANU/SC/0667/1975 = (1975) 1 SCC 421 14 UDPR, J WP.No.4242 of 2020 Supreme Court observed that Rules, Regulations, Schemes, Bye-laws, orders are the facets of delegated legislation and they have the force of parent legislation. The observations are as follows:
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - U D Rao - Full Document

The vs Government Of A.P. Rep on 10 July, 2020

In Sukhdev Singh and others vs. Bhagat Ram and others2, the question fell for the decision of Hon'ble apex court was whether regulations framed under Oil and Natural Gas Commission Act, 1959; the Industrial Finance Corporation Act, 1948 and Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 have the force of law. In this context, the Supreme Court observed that Rules, Regulations, Schemes, Bye-laws, orders are the facets of delegated legislation and they have the force of parent legislation. The observations are as follows:
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - U D Rao - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next