Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.36 seconds)

Shree vs The on 19 April, 2011

The attention of the Court was drawn to an order dated 17th March 2011 passed by this High Court in the case of Gopal Iron & Steel Co. (Gujarat) Ltd. v. Union of India, in Special Civil Application No.501 of 2011, wherein, at the time of admitting the petition, the learned counsel for the petitioners had stated that the petitioners wish to press the sole ground of challenge viz., that with the omission of section 3A of the Central Excise Act, without any corresponding saving clause, no proceedings for levy of excise duty under deeming fiction of section 33A would survive and the proceedings instituted by the Department, culminating into passing of the impugned order, therefore, is wholly without authority. It was further stated that the petitioners wish to press no other ground against the order of the Commissioner. The learned counsel submitted that in the facts of the present case also against the order made by the adjudicating authority, the petitioners have an efficacious alternative remedy available under the relevant statutory provisions and as such, the challenge in the petition may be limited to the fresh challenge raised in the present application.
Gujarat High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - H Devani - Full Document

Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... vs M/S Kay Bouvei Engineering Pvt. Ltd on 22 August, 2013

6.3 As regards the reliance placed by the respondent in the case of Steelco Gujarat (supra), the issue before the Hon'ble Bombay High Court was eligibility to DFIA Scheme under the Foreign Trade Policy when the credit is reversed. The said decision in no way deals with interest and penal liability under the Central Excise Act or the Cenvat Credit Rules; therefore, the said decision would not apply to the facts of the present case.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

4. Whether Order Is To Be Circulated To ... vs M/S Sanathan Textiles Pvt.Ltd on 7 April, 2014

6. At the outset, we find that the contention of the ld.Counsel that they have reversed an amount of Rs.3,26,564/- of the CENVAT Credit availed on common input services for the period 18.01.2007 to 31.03.2008 and 01.04.2008 to 31.03.2010. To that extent, we hold that the appellant has complied with the law as has been settled by the higher Court that once the CENVAT Credit is reversed, it has to be held that the appellant had not availed such CENVAT Credit. For this, we gainfully rely upon the ratio laid down by the Apex Court in the case of CCE Mumbai Vs Bombay Dyeing & Mfg.Co.Ltd  2007 (215) ELT 3 (SC), which has been followed by the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in the case of Steelco Gujarat Ltd Vs. UoI  2012 (285) ELT 161 (Bom.)
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Aryan vs Union on 27 June, 2008

2 In the aforesaid circumstances, the Court would have, in normal circumstances, issued notice to the Official Liquidator. However, it is an accepted position that the dispute raised in the present petition is no longer res integra. By a judgment and order dated 04.07.2006 rendered in case of M/s. Gopal Iron & Steel Co., (Gujarat) Ltd. Vs. Union of India in Special Civil Application No. 8387 of 2003 and cognate matters this Court has upheld the validity of provisions of Rule 3 brought into effect after exercise of the powers conferred u/s. 3A(2) of the Central Excise Act,1944. In the circumstances, the petition is required to be rejected for the same reasons as recorded in judgment dated 04.07.2006 in Special Civil Application No. 8387 of 2003 and cognate matters.
Gujarat High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - H B Antani - Full Document

Choksi Silk Mills vs Surat-I on 11 September, 2024

 M/s. Gopal Iron & Steel Co (Gujarat) Ltd. Vs. Union of India Hon'ble High Court order dated 09.02.2024  CCE V/s. Cosmo Denim 2017(1) TMI 1021- Gujarat High Court  UOI V/s. Supreme Steel and General Mills 2001(133) ELT 513 (S.C.)  Hon'ble Gujarat High Court order dated 02.08.1999 in case of M/s. Choksi Silk Mills V/s. UOI  Hon'ble Gujarat High Court order dated 11.12.2002 in case of M/s. Somnath Steel Industries V/s.UOI  Mahalaxmi Fibers Pvt.Ltd. V/s. UOI 2019(366) ELT 810 (Guj.)
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1