M.S.Vijay Anand vs State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By on 29 September, 2009
17(c). It is his submission that conferring of marks for experience does not amount to diluting the merit system and it is not a reservation. According to him, for professional courses experience is presumed to be merit and the concept of experience was taken into consideration for a long period, that is, from the year 1994 itself and in support of his submission, he would rely upon the judgments in Pre-PG Medical Sangharsh Committee vs. Dr.Bajrang Soni (2001 (8) SCC 694), Dr.K.Sivasubramaniyam vs. Madras Institute of Development Studies (2006 (5) CTC 207), Rashmi Kant vs. Principal G.S.V.M. Medical College (AIR 1989 Allahabad 55 DB), Dr.Preeti Srivastava vs. State of M.P.[(1999) 7 SCC 120], State of Punjab vs. Dayanand Medical College and Hospital (AIR 2001 SC 3006 ), State of M.P. vs. Gopal D.Tirthani (AIR 2003 SC 2952) and M.P. Public Service Commission v. Navnit Kumar Potdar[(1994) 6 SCC 293].