Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.54 seconds)
Documents citing Mr. D.M. Talwar vs Delhi Development Authority on 16 January, 2004

M/S Karnataka Hotel vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 May, 2024

18. In view of conclusions at paragraphs 82.3 and 82.4 as above, grounds urged in writ petition herein would be tenable. Consequently, ratio in D.M.Talwar's case (supra) would be subdued and contentions urged about invocation of jurisdiction of this Court at pre-contract stage and for challenging fixation of tentative allotment price as also contention that there was no fixation of final allotment price yet, would fade away.
Karnataka High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - R V Hosmani - Full Document

Madura Coats Limited vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 9 July, 2004

''28. A writ petition is filed in public law remedy. The High Court while exercising a power of judicial review is concerned with illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety of an order passed by the State or a statutory authority. Remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot be invoked for resolution of a private law dispute as contradistinguished from a dispute involving public law character.'' (Also See Mr D.M. Talwar v. Delhi Development Authority: ).
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 1 - B D Ahmed - Full Document

Shakuntla Singh vs Chairman, Delhi Development Authority on 5 February, 2024

The Respondent also placed reliance upon the judgment of D M TALWAR vs DDA dated 16.1.2004 whereby it was held that It goes to establish that the price fixation is the solo right of developing authority. As per Brochure of the scheme Escalation in price of flat had already notified by the DDA in its scheme. It is further submitted that when both the Hon'ble Courts came to the same conclusion, then there is no infirmity in the facts of the case.  The petitioner did not indicate that flat in question was being purchased for her source of livelihood. Fixation of price of commercial flat is beyond the jurisdiction of Forum/Commission.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1