M/S. Ispat Industries Ltd. vs Union Of India & Others on 4 November, 2009
14. In view of the aforesaid discussion, I do not find any error or
mistake in the order dated 6th October, 2006 passed by the
revisionary authority. Counsel for the fourth respondent had relied
W.P.(C) 17320/2006 Page 10
upon the decisions of the Supreme Court in Jasbhai Motibhai Desai
Vs. Roshan Kumar, Haji Bashir Ahmed & Others, (1976) 3 SCR
58 and Suvarna Cements Ltd. Vs. The Government of A.P. and
Others, AIR 2002 Andhra Pradesh 401 and submitted that the
petitioner herein is not an aggrieved person and, therefore, writ of
certiorari as prayed for is not maintainable. I am not deciding the said
contention in view of the reasoning given above. The other
contentions raised by the fourth respondent relying upon doctrine of
waiver are also not examined. However, it is noticed that the
petitioner has secured a letter of intent dated 6th October, 2006,
issued by the State Government covering an area of 2050 hectares.
This fact, however, is not mentioned in the writ petition, which was
filed on 1st November, 2006.