Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.24 seconds)
Documents citing Kuldip Chand Pathania vs Chandigarh Housing Board & Ors on 13 January, 2015

Charanjit Singh vs Chandigarh Housing Board And Anr on 21 May, 2015

"In continuation of office order No. HB/AOI/SO(VII)- 2012/2684 dated 29.02.2012 and in pursuance of Hon'ble High JAWALA RAM Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh, decision dated 2015.05.26 17:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CWP No. 4685 of 2015 -2- 13.01.2015, passed in CWP No.27322 of 2013, titled as "Kuldip Chand Pathania Vs. Chandigarh Housing Board and others", a reference was made to the Sr. Standing Counsel, Chandigarh Housing Board for soliciting legal opinion in connection with this decision. The Sr. Standing Counsel, CHB has opined that the Judgement does not confer any right during the lock-in period. As such any transfer that takes place will be 'in presenti'. As long as there are no financial implications to the detriment of CHB, transfers may go ahead.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jasbir Singh vs Chandigarh Housing Board And Anr on 6 May, 2015

"In continuation of office order No. HB/AOI/SO(VII)- 2012/2684 dated 29.02.2012 and in pursuance of Hon'ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh, decision dated 13.01.2015, passed in CWP No.27322 of 2013, titled as "Kuldip Chand Pathania Vs. Chandigarh Housing Board and others", a reference was made to the Sr. Standing Counsel, Chandigarh Housing Board for soliciting legal opinion in connection with this decision. The Sr. Standing Counsel, CHB has opined that the Judgement does not confer any right during the lock-in period. As such any transfer that takes place will be 'in presenti'. As long as there are no financial implications to the detriment of CHB, transfers may go ahead.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1